# Sage Intacct vs Fathom: which do AI models recommend for financial consolidation, October 2026

Finance AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Financial consolidation. One of fourteen models named Sage Intacct first on the direct prompt; zero named Fathom. Page: https://finance-ai-index.com/accounting/financial-consolidation/sage-intacct-vs-fathom/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sage Intacct | 16% | #2 of 12 | 21% | 19 | 13 of 14 |
| Fathom | 2% | #8 of 12 | 0% | 10 | 9 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- GLM 4.7 FlashX: sage intacct first (first choices: Prophix, Sage Intacct) (alternatives: Cube, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, Planful)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither named (first choices: Planful, Prophix) (alternatives: DOKKA, HighRadius, OneStream, Vena)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: OneStream) (alternatives: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither named (first choices: Prophix) (alternatives: Anaplan Financial Consolidation, Lucanet, Planful, Vena)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither named (first choices: Prophix) (alternatives: Cube, HighRadius, Planful, Vena)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither named (first choices: Prophix) (alternatives: Centage Planning Maestro, Planful, SoftLedger, Vena)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Planful, Prophix) (alternatives: OneStream)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Planful, Prophix) (alternatives: Cube, FloQast)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Prophix) (alternatives: Bluecopa, Cubesoftware, HighRadius)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Prophix) (alternatives: Cube, OneStream, Pigment, Vena)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Fluence Technologies, Planful) (alternatives: Datarails, FloQast, Vena)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither named (first choices: Planful, Prophix) (alternatives: Fluence Technologies)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Planful) (alternatives: Oracle NetSuite, Prophix, Vena)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither named (first choices: Prophix) (alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Fluence Technologies, Planful)

## What the models said about Sage Intacct

- "Starts around $12,000/year (single user) with implementation costs of $5K
$50K" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, hard negative)
- "avoid big-suite tools like Planful or Sage Intacct" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, hard negative)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.