# Workday Adaptive Planning vs Pigment: which do AI models recommend for corporate performance ma, October 2026

Finance AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Corporate performance management. One of fourteen models named Workday Adaptive Planning first on the direct prompt; zero named Pigment. Page: https://finance-ai-index.com/planning/corporate-performance-management/workday-adaptive-planning-vs-pigment/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workday Adaptive Planning | 10% | #4 of 14 | 29% | 52 | 14 of 14 |
| Pigment | 2% | #8 of 14 | 0% | 11 | 7 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- MiniMax M2.5: workday adaptive planning first (first choices: Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning) (alternatives: Cube, Prophix, Vena)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Drivetrain) (alternatives: Jedox, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Cube, Vena) (alternatives: Abacum, Datarails, Mosaic, Pigment, Planful, Prophix)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Planful) (alternatives: Datarails, Drivetrain, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Planful, Prophix) (alternatives: OneStream, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Planful) (alternatives: Drivetrain, Pigment, Prophix, Vena)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither first, one named (first choices: Planful) (alternatives: Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: Planful) (alternatives: NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: neither first, one named (first choices: Planful, Prophix) (alternatives: Cube, Workday Adaptive Planning)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither named (first choices: Planful, Vena) (alternatives: Board, Jedox, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Profitbase EPM, Prophix) (alternatives: IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Phocas Software)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Planful) (alternatives: Drivetrain, Prophix)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Datarails, Drivetrain, Vena) (alternatives: Cube, Planful, Prophix)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither named (first choices: Cube, Prophix) (alternatives: Planful)

## What the models said about Workday Adaptive Planning

- "it is recommended to avoid defaulting to Workday Adaptive if cost predictability across thousands of users is a top priority" (Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Adaptive Insights (if you want a clean web interface). These two cover the vast majority of mid-sized B2B use cases effectively." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Pigment

- "Pigment (Best for Collaborative, Cross-Functional Planning)... has rapidly become a favorite for modern B2B SaaS and services companies" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "Safer bets if cautious: Newer/lower-implementation options like Pigment, Planful, Prophix, or Drivetrain" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.
