# Navan vs SAP Concur: which do AI models recommend for expense management, October 2026

Finance AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Expense management. Two of fourteen models named Navan first on the direct prompt; two named SAP Concur. Page: https://finance-ai-index.com/spend/expense-management/navan-vs-sap-concur/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Navan | 4% | #6 of 11 | 7% | 27 | 14 of 14 |
| SAP Concur | 4% | #8 of 11 | 44% | 45 | 14 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Muse Glimmer 30B: both first (first choices: Navan, SAP Concur) (alternatives: Airbase, Paylocity, Rippling Spend, Rydoo)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: navan first (first choices: Navan) (alternatives: Expensify, Rippling Spend)
- MiniMax M2.5: sap concur first (first choices: Expensify, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur) (alternatives: Airwallex, BILL Spend & Expense, Navan, Paylocity, Ramp)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Ramp, Spendesk) (alternatives: Airbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Navan)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Rippling Spend) (alternatives: Brex, Navan, Payhawk, Ramp, SAP Concur)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Ramp) (alternatives: Airbase, Brex, Navan, Rippling Spend)
- Perplexity Sonar: neither first, one named (first choices: Payhawk) (alternatives: BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Procurify, SAP Concur)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Airbase, Ramp) (alternatives: Expensify, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: Ramp) (alternatives: Brex, Navan, SAP Concur)
- Mistral Small: neither named (first choices: Airbase) (alternatives: BILL Spend & Expense, Eco, Ramp)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: neither named (first choices: Airbase, Ramp) (alternatives: Brex, Payhawk)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Brex, Ramp) (alternatives: BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Rydoo)
- Kimi K2: neither named (first choices: Expensify, Ramp) (alternatives: Brex, Emburse)

## What the models said about SAP Concur

- "Cautions: Slow OCR, rigid workflows, and approver experience issues are common in larger enterprise rollouts." (Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "SAP Concur - has an outdated and unintuitive user interface, complex and time-consuming expense submission." (Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt, hard negative)
- "Choose SAP Concur / Navan for large, international B2B with travel + expense integration and strict compliance." (Muse Glimmer 30B, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.