# Double: how AI models rank it, October 2026

Finance AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition. Named in 6 judge labels across 1 categories by 5 of 14 models. Page: https://finance-ai-index.com/vendors/double/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close management | 2% | 9 | 0% | 6 |

## What the models said for it

- "Under $100/month total | Financial Cents, Double, Xenett, Easy Month End" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, Financial close manageme)
- "Double ($10–$50/client/mo) ... bookkeeping-focused tools strong on transaction review and error detection" (Muse Glimmer 30B, Financial close manageme)
- "Another option to consider is Double" (Mistral Small, Financial close manageme)
- "Double (Best for Bookkeepers)" (MiniMax M2.5, Financial close manageme)

## Movement since September 2026

Floor: 10 points of share, measured on the calibration repeat. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise.

- Financial close management: 2% to 2%, ±0. Inside the floor by 10 points · rank 8 → 9 of 85.

## In its own words

What Double's own pages state, read 2026-09-28. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: AI-powered, ledger-integrated close management for accounting firms and teams. Automate manual work, gain real-time visibility, and close the books faster. (https://doublehq.com/)
- For: accounting firms and teams (https://doublehq.com/)
- Price stated: Pay monthly per connected client, with unlimited users. (https://doublehq.com/pricing-plans)
- Starting price: 10 (https://doublehq.com/pricing-plans)
- Free plan or trial: free trial (https://doublehq.com/pricing-plans)
- Certifications: SOC 2 Type II Certified
- Customers named: Springstead Solutions, Attivo Partners, MCO Bookkeeping, LivFree Bookkeeping, LLC, Brantner Bookkeeping, LLC, Trac-1 Solutions, Tabz, Cain Watters & Associates

## What it publishes

Every page doublehq.com exposes, read 2026-09-29: 336 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 84 pages, 13 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-24
- case study: 25 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- webinar or virtual event: 1 pages, 1 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-08-26
- conference or event: 2 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- report or ebook: 3 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- comparison: 9 pages, 6 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-24
- template or tool: 4 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- glossary or explainer: 3 pages, 2 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-07-31
- Recent: 2026-09-24 comparison: Accrued vs deferred accounting https://doublehq.com/blog/accrued-vs-deferred-accounting/
- Recent: 2026-09-24 blog: Amortize intangible assets https://doublehq.com/blog/amortize-intangible-assets/
- Recent: 2026-09-23 comparison: Cash basis vs accrual accounting key differences https://doublehq.com/blog/cash-basis-vs-accrual-accounting-key-differences/
- Recent: 2026-09-23 blog: How intercompany reconciliation works https://doublehq.com/blog/how-intercompany-reconciliation-works/
- Recent: 2026-09-23 blog: Fixed assets types depreciation examples https://doublehq.com/blog/fixed-assets-types-depreciation-examples/
- Recent: 2026-09-23 blog: Month end close process best practices https://doublehq.com/blog/month-end-close-process-best-practices/

## Record

- Method: https://finance-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://finance-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Finance AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, finance-ai-index.com.