# SharePoint: how AI models rank it, October 2026

Finance AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition. Named in 8 judge labels across 5 categories by 4 of 14 models. Page: https://finance-ai-index.com/vendors/sharepoint/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board and investor reporting | 0% | 94 | 67% | 3 |
| Entity management | 0% | 78 | 100% | 2 |
| Board portals | 0% | 42 | 100% | 1 |
| Transfer pricing | 0% | 76 | 0% | 1 |
| Virtual data rooms | 0% | 45 | 100% | 1 |

## And against it

- "like Teams, SharePoint, or Dropbox: useful for sharing files, but not built for board governance, role-based access, or audit trails" (Perplexity Sonar, Board)
- "Tools like Google Drive, Dropbox, SharePoint, or OneDrive used for high‑stakes transactions. - Why risky: No granular permissions" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, Virtual data rooms)
- "Email + SharePoint/Google Drive)... introduce significant risks when used as primary board reporting channels." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Board)
- "avoid using generic tools (like SharePoint or Excel) for entity management" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Entity management)

## Movement since September 2026

Floor: 10 points of share, measured on the calibration repeat. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise.

- Board and investor reporting: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 10 points · rank 80 → 94 of 99.
- Entity management: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 10 points · rank 80 → 78 of 81.
- Board portals: 0% to 0%, ±0. New · not ranked in September 2026 · rank 42 of 50.
- Transfer pricing: 0% to 0%, ±0. New · not ranked in September 2026 · rank 76 of 101.
- Virtual data rooms: 0% to 0%, ±0. New · not ranked in September 2026 · rank 45 of 48.

## Record

- Method: https://finance-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://finance-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Finance AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, finance-ai-index.com.