# Workday P2P/T&E: how AI models rank it, October 2026

Finance AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition. Named in 3 judge labels across 1 categories by 3 of 14 models. Page: https://finance-ai-index.com/vendors/workday-p2p-t-e/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 84 | 67% | 3 |

## And against it

- "Platforms Frequently Criticized | Workday P2P & T&E | • Poor user experience and cumbersome interface" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, Procure-to-pay)
- "only mentioned in a Reddit thread, which says to avoid it" (Perplexity Sonar, Procure-to-pay)

## Movement since September 2026

Floor: 10 points of share, measured on the calibration repeat. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise.

- Procure-to-pay: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 10 points · rank 78 → 84 of 87.

## In its own words

What Workday P2P/T&E's own pages state, read 2026-10-05. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: IGS Energy streamlined the expense management process with Workday. (https://www.workday.com/en-us/pages/ig-igs-energy-customer-expense-management.html)
- For: les équipes Achats (https://www.workday.com/fr-fr/topics/erp/procurement.html)
- Certifications: ISO 42001, 27001, 27701
- Customers named: IGS Energy, Amazon, Broward College, Veolia

## Record

- Method: https://finance-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://finance-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Finance AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, finance-ai-index.com.