Four of fourteen models named Greenly first on the direct prompt; one named Watershed. Greenly was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Watershed by fourteen and Greenly carries 36 labels and Watershed 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ESG and carbon reporting page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Greenly and Watershed were named in the same answer thirty-six times, of the 103 answers naming Greenly and the 84 naming Watershed. In those answers Watershed took the first choice zero times and Greenly fifteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Usually not ideal on a limited budget: tools like Greenly ... can be costly for small businesses” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“High cost for smaller firms; first cycle needs heavy verification.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Need supported SME service with transparent pricing: Greenly. The €1,400 / $3,800 per year entry tier is the lowest published SME carbon/CSRD package in 2026.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“That makes it a good first pick when you want automated data collection, a user-friendly UI and lower total cost of ownership.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Greenly is the strongest all-around choice, offering a balance of affordability, ease of use, and robust features” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid - Watershed — Excellent but typically over $50K–$250K/year; better suited for large enterprises” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“rather than self-serve platforms (like Watershed, which assumes you have an in-house expert to run the strategy)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“built for large corporations and carry five-figure price tags and long sales cycles” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Choose Watershed or Persefoni if: Your primary immediate pain point is calculating Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions accurately” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“It is the current market leader for mid-market to enterprise. It excels at automating carbon accounting” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest focusing on vendors like Greenly, Novisto, Tracera, or Watershed” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.