OnBoard vs Boardable
Eleven of fourteen models named OnBoard first on the direct prompt; zero named Boardable. Both were named by all fourteen models and OnBoard carries 39 labels and Boardable 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.
By framing
OnBoardFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBoardable
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, OnBoard and Boardable were named in the same answer 138 times, of the 262 answers naming OnBoard and the 207 naming Boardable. In those answers Boardable took the first choice thirty times and OnBoard eighteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
OnBoard Boardable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OnBoard on the left and Boardable on the right.The direct prompt
OnBoard first, Boardable an alternative
11 of 14 modelsBoardable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
OnBoard26%#1 of 8Boardable13%#2 of 8What the models said about OnBoard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“avoid enterprise-heavy giants (like Diligent, OnBoard, or Nasdaq Boardvantage, which often run upwards of $10,000 annually)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve, especially for permissions and admin setup... Caution if: Small teams or non-tech-savvy boards” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“OnBoard leads in comparisons for mid-sized companies transitioning from emails/manuals—praised for intuitive interface, comprehensive features, and balance of cost/usability.” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“OnBoard - serves over 2,000 organizations across 32 countries and offers a balance of features and cost that fits organizations between startup and enterprise.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Boardable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“A popular low-cost option for nonprofits, but it has a critical blind spot” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Budget-friendly ... but better suited to smaller nonprofits.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“The best board reporting software for a company with a limited budget is Boardable, which is purpose-built for nonprofit boards at $20.99 per user per month.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Recommendation: Start with Boardable if you need polished reporting features without breaking the bank—it's the most accessible for limited budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“For most companies with a limited budget, Boardable offers the best balance of features, pricing transparency, and ease of use.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.