Ecommerce fraud prevention · October 2026 Edition
Eftsure vs Signifyd
Zero of fourteen models named Eftsure first on the direct prompt; four named Signifyd. Eftsure was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Signifyd by fourteen and Eftsure carries 16 labels and Signifyd 43, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share16%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%19%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1643A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Eftsure reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SEON was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. SEON vs Eftsure · SEON vs Signifyd · Eftsure vs Stripe Radar
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ecommerce fraud prevention page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
EftsureFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSignifyd
Direct041 against Signifyd
Paraphrase80
Comparative06
Budget-constrained002 against Signifyd
Scale-constrained00
Negative005 against Signifyd
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Eftsure and Signifyd stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Eftsure Signifyd first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Eftsure on the left and Signifyd on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Eftsure and Signifyd stood in it.
Signifyd first, Eftsure an alternative
4 of 14 modelsEftsure was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallSignifyd alternatives: NoFraud, Sift
Qwen 3.7 FlashSignifyd alternatives: Fingerprint, Kount
GLM 4.7 FlashXSignifyd alternatives: ClearSale, Eftsure, SEON, Sift
Muse Glimmer 30BSignifyd, Wyllo, formerly NoFraud alternatives: Eftsure, SEON
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5FraudNet, Trustmi alternatives: Kount, Sift, Signifyd
GPT-5.4 miniSift alternatives: Forter, Kount, Signifyd
Gemini 3.5 FlashSEON alternatives: Allianz Trade Pay, Sift, Signifyd, TreviPay
Perplexity SonarSEON alternatives: Kount, Sift, Signifyd
Grok 4.1 FastSift alternatives: Chargeflow, Fingerprint, SEON, Signifyd, Wyllo
DeepSeek V4 FlashSEON alternatives: Sift, Signifyd, Stripe Radar
Llama 4 MaverickWyllo alternatives: NoFraud, SEON, Sift, Signifyd, cside
Kimi K2SEON alternatives: Eftsure, Kount, Trustmi
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.MiniMax M2.5ClearSale, SEON alternatives: Forter, Riskified
GPT-6 LunaSEON alternatives: Kount
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Signifyd leads by seven points.
Signifyd7%#4 of 12Eftsure0%#– of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Eftsure leads at mid-market.
Eftsure16%#2 of 11Signifyd8%#4 of 11Enterprise
The order flips: Signifyd leads at enterprise.
Signifyd20%#2 of 9Eftsure2%#– of 9What the models said about Eftsure
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Best for Preventing B2B Payment Fraud (Vendor/Invoice Fraud) ... Eftsure ... Designed specifically for mid-to-large enterprises managing complex vendor ecosystems.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Eftsure is the most specialized and highly recommended due to its real-time vendor validation, B2B focus, and financial guarantee.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Eftsure or Trustmi since they're specifically built for B2B payment fraud use cases.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Signifyd
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Signifyd's public terms define eligible chargebacks narrowly... That's a reason to get the exact coverage schedule and exclusions in the signed agreement—not, by itself, a reason to avoid Signifyd.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Signifyd or Riskified if: You want to outsource fraud completely... Go with Signifyd if you are mid-market and want seamless e-commerce platform plug-ins.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“The original "chargeback guarantee" pioneer ... Best fit: High-volume merchants ($10M+ GMV) who want fraud completely off their plate.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“The Best Overall (Especially for Open Credit): Signifyd ... widely considered the gold standard for B2B commerce” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.