AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Tax and compliance › AML monitoring › Sanction Scanner vs Unit21
AML and transaction monitoring · October 2026 Edition

Sanction Scanner vs Unit21

Zero of fourteen models named Sanction Scanner first on the direct prompt; three named Unit21. Sanction Scanner was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Unit21 by twelve and Sanction Scanner carries 17 labels and Unit21 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Sanction Scanner

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Unit21

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share13%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1722A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Sanction Scanner reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ComplyAdvantage was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. ComplyAdvantage vs Sanction Scanner · ComplyAdvantage vs Unit21 · Flagright vs Sanction Scanner

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AML and transaction monitoring page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Sanction ScannerFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUnit21
Direct031 against Unit21
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained50
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Sanction Scanner · 2 against Unit21
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Sanction Scanner and Unit21 were named in the same answer fourteen times, of the 48 answers naming Sanction Scanner and the 63 naming Unit21. In those answers Unit21 took the first choice two times and Sanction Scanner three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Sanction Scanner and Unit21 stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Sanction Scanner Unit21 first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Sanction Scanner on the left and Unit21 on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Sanction Scanner and Unit21 stood in it.

Unit21 first, Sanction Scanner an alternative

3 of 14 modelsSanction Scanner was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniUnit21 alternatives: Feedzai, Fenergo
GPT-6 LunaUnit21 alternatives: Alloy, ComplyAdvantage, Sardine
Muse Glimmer 30BUnit21 alternatives: Alessa, Eftsure, Feedzai, Hawk AI, Napier AI Continuum, Sanction Scanner

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Alessa, ComplyAdvantage alternatives: Napier AI, Unit21
Gemini 3.5 FlashAlloy alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Sumsub, Unit21
Mistral SmallFeedzai alternatives: Alessa, ComplyAdvantage, Napier AI, ThetaRay, Unit21
DeepSeek V4 FlashComplyAdvantage alternatives: Alessa, Unit21

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarTrustform alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Flagright, Hawk AI
Grok 4.1 FastFlagright alternatives: Alessa, Hummingbird, Ondato
Llama 4 MaverickSphinx alternatives: FraudNet, Ondato, Shuftipro, Tookitaki
Qwen 3.7 FlashComplyCube alternatives: Dow Jones Risk & Compliance, Sumsub, Trulioo
Kimi K2ComplyAdvantage, Flagright alternatives: Alessa, Lucinity, Sift
GLM 4.7 FlashXComplyAdvantage, NorthRow alternatives: Alloy, SEON
MiniMax M2.5no first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Sanction Scanner leads by ten points.
Sanction Scanner15%#3 of 14
Unit215%#6 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Sanction Scanner leads by eight points.
Sanction Scanner13%#3 of 13
Unit216%#4 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Unit21 leads at enterprise.
Unit212%#6 of 11
Sanction Scanner0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Sanction Scanner

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Explicitly described as screening-only / sanctions and PEP, not full transaction monitoring.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Sanction Scanner if you want the best all-around balance of features and usability.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Positioned as a budget-friendly AML for businesses of any size with tier-based pricing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Sanction Scanner - Cost-effective screening solution - API-first approach” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Unit21

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Users of platforms like Unit21 have occasionally noted steep learning curves and initial challenges with data mapping and exporting.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“their suitability depends on your business model, transaction volume, and regulatory requirements” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“note that it sits at a higher price point (~$160K/year)” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Choose Unit21 / Hawk AI / Feedzai if you need real-time fraud + AML convergence, AI case management and sub-second decisioning across multiple rails.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest default choice is often Unit21” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd put Unit21 first on the shortlist” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.