Three of fourteen models named TPGenie first on the direct prompt; one named TPdoc. TPGenie was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and TPdoc by seven and TPGenie carries 47 labels and TPdoc 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the transfer pricing page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, TPGenie and TPdoc were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 133 answers naming TPGenie and the 25 naming TPdoc. In those answers TPdoc took the first choice three times and TPGenie four.
| Model | DirectTPTP | ParaphraseTPTP | ComparativeTPTP | Budget-constrainedTPTP | Scale-constrainedTPTP | NegativeTPTP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | TP | TP | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | TP | TPTP | TP | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | TPTP | TP | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | TP | TPTP | TP | TP | TP | |
| Mistral Small | TP | TPTP | TP | TP | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | TP | TP | TP | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | TP | TP | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | TP | TP | TP | TP | ||
| Kimi K2 | TP | TP | TP | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | TP | TP | TP | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | TP | TPTP | TP | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | TP | TP | TP | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | TP | TP | TP | TP |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Caution due to: High dependency on data discipline.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“TPGenie is commonly cited as best fit for SMB transfer pricing teams that need recurring, structured documentation drafting with centralized agreements” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“TPGenie is the best fit for SMB transfer pricing teams that need recurring, structured documentation drafting with centralized agreements” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“the best fit in the results is TPGenie because it is explicitly positioned as an SMB transfer pricing tool” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“TPdoc and Spherion are the top recommendations due to their ease of use, compliance features, and scalability” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“I would most likely recommend TPdoc if your main need is transfer pricing documentation automation” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend TPdoc as your intercompany transfer pricing documentation tool” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.