Finance AI Index

Index › Products › Asignet · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Asignet

15Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Asignet was named 6 times in Telecom expense mgmt, where Genuity led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market22 of 89

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 69

under the label threshold

In telecom expense mgmt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Asignet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Telecom expense management	Spend and procurement	0%	22 of 89	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Genuity at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Asignet yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Asignet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	1	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“It is a strong fit for enterprises requiring highly automated back-end invoice reconciliation without manual intervention.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Telecom expense mgmt · comparative prompt · alternative

“Asignet if invoice automation is the central use case” GPT-6 Luna · Telecom expense mgmt · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for AI-Powered Automation” Kimi K2 · Telecom expense mgmt · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Asignet, particularly if you're inheriting a Cass TEM account — verify the transition.” GPT-6 Luna · Telecom expense mgmt · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Asignet, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Asignet was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tangoe One Telecom13 of 158Not among the top eight

Brightfin12 of 151Not among the top eight

Calero11 of 154Not among the top eight

Sakon10 of 152Not among the top eight

Lightyear6 of 150Not among the top eight

vCom Solutions5 of 150Not among the top eight

Upland Cimpl4 of 151Not among the top eight

Cass Information Systems3 of 150Not among the top eight

Mindglobal3 of 150Not among the top eight

Tellennium3 of 150Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Asignet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Asignet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com10

sociumit.com7

mindglobal.com6

sakon.com6

tangoe.com6

uplandsoftware.com6

valicomtech.com5

capterra.com4

thectoclub.com4

use.expensify.com4

Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Asignet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/telecom-expense-management-services-global9

mindglobal.com/best-telecom-expense-management-providers5

sociumit.com/resources/blog/best-telecom-expense-management-software-20265

sakon.com/hubfs/Market_Guide_for_Tel_802496_ndx.pdf4

thectoclub.com/tools/best-telecom-expense-management-software4

uplandsoftware.com/cimpl/technology-expense-management/best-telecom-expense-management-sof4

use.expensify.com/resource-center/guides/telecom-expense-management-solutions4

valicomtech.com/blog/top-telecom-expense-management-companies-in-20264

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

asignet.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Asignet takes 0% of first choices and Genuity takes 19%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “telecom expense management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “telecom expense management platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 260 a month (“asignet”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 110 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 70 · 1 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 576
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

15 ads · 11 text, 4 image · 8 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as Authenware Uruguay SA, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 4 in the year, 11 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 22 of 89 in telecom expense mgmt

Segment leader

19%

Genuity

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 15 answers
Its own site cited: in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on asignet.com

319

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

204

Product · Integration

5 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	83	4	2026-09-16	Expense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Comparison	6	0	2022-01-03
Glossary or explainer	2	0	2021-04-30	Expense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-16Business spend management guide blog
2026-08-27Guide to robotic process automation rpa blog
2026-08-20Your biggest source of spend leakage may be hidden in your invoices blog
2026-07-29Complete guide to telecom expense management tem blog
2026-05-13Asignet named in the gartner market guide for managed mobility services global blog
2026-05-11How to fix the tem buyer seller relationship blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page asignet.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name expense management (13); 4 name the category the models place it in. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Asignet

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Asignet; a claim can dispute any of them.

Asignet (formerly Cass) 1

Follow Asignet

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Asignet is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The payment integrity platform for IT and business spend that gives you full visibility and automated control across telecom, mobile, SaaS, cloud, and vendor expenses.
asignet.com
For: organizations managing complex spend environments worldwide
asignet.com
Integrations claimed: 100 asignet.com/solutions/saas-management
Customers named: WestBox Inc.
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting

What Asignet's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: asignet.com, asignet.com/solutions/saas-management, asignet.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Asignet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Asignet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Asignet by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Asignet is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Asignet, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.