Index › Products › DAI · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

DAI

13Judge labels

0First choices

6Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. DAI was named 9 times in Stablecoin platforms, where BVNK led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market23 of 141

under the label threshold

Enterprise109 of 111

under the label threshold

In stablecoin platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DAI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Stablecoin platforms	Treasury and cash	0%	23 of 141	22%	9	under 10 labels · led by BVNK at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DAI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DAI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose DAI for decentralization and DeFi-native applications” Kimi K2 · Stablecoin platforms · comparative prompt · first choice

“decentralized, blue-chip protocols (like DAI, provided you monitor its exposure to corporate debt carefully)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · negative prompt · alternative

“For decentralization & DeFi ideology: DAI/USDS — no central issuer, community-governed” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“For decentralization: Choose DAI or Frax” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Stablecoin platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“with ~0.10 to 0.30% 30-day volatility it is materially more volatile than fiat-backed tokens and is typically treated as a DeFi tool, not a payment rail” Muse Glimmer 30B · Stablecoin platforms · negative prompt · soft negative

“Usually too complex/risky for general corporate treasury right now.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DAI, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DAI was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

USDC11 of 137Not among the top eight

USDT6 of 132Not among the top eight

Tether4 of 130Not among the top eight

Frax3 of 130Not among the top eight

PYUSD3 of 130Not among the top eight

TUSD3 of 130Not among the top eight

TerraUSD3 of 130Not among the top eight

USDe3 of 130Not among the top eight

BUSD2 of 130Not among the top eight

EURC2 of 130Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DAI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 13 answers that named DAI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eco.com7

stripe.com5

kraken.com4

mexc.com4

research.titanfx.com4

frontiersin.org3

gate.com3

home.treasury.gov3

spark.money3

stablecoininsider.org3

No domain is on file for DAI, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

research.titanfx.com/crypto-trading/stablecoin4

frontiersin.org/journals/blockchain/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2026.1797659/full3

home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/StableCoinReport_Nov1_508.pdf3

alchemy.com/overviews/enterprise-stablecoin-guide2

benzinga.com/money/best-stablecoins-and-4-types-of-stablecoins2

bleap.finance/blog/best-stablecoins-which-one-should-you-hold2

blog.cex.io/ecosystem/stablecoin-landscape-348642

bpi.com/stablecoin-risks-some-warning-bells2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where DAI stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“dai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 7,608,927 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 23 of 141 in stablecoin platforms

Segment leader

23%

BVNK

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 13 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as DAI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as DAI; a claim can dispute any of them.

DAI (MakerDAO) 1DAI / USDS (Sky Protocol, formerly MakerDAO) 1Dai (DAI) 1Dai (MakerDAO) 1SUSD / DAI 1

Follow DAI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DAI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DAI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DAI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where DAI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name DAI, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.