Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
1 category · RankedER/Studio
13Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Financial modeling for enterprise buyers
Rank 26 of 77 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market26 of 77
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise13 of 125
0%12 labels
criticized challenger
In financial modeling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ER/Studio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 0% | 26 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Excel at 14% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ER/Studio held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial modeling · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 100 → 26 of 75
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 81 → 12 of 111
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial modeling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 100 → 26 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ER/Studio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ER/Studio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Enterprise teams with governance and compliance needs should evaluate ER/Studio or Erwin Data Modeler.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Financial modeling · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ER/Studio, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ER/Studio was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ER/Studio, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ER/Studio was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ER/Studio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named ER/Studio and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
smartdatacollective.com10
erstudio.comYour site9
skyvia.com8
hevodata.com6
guideflow.com5
airbyte.com4
ardoq.com4
astera.com4
g2.com4
integrate.io4
Forty-nine of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming ER/Studio came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
erstudio.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ER/Studio takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Excel takes 14%.ShowHide
Search and answers
erstudio.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ER/Studio takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Excel takes 14%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “modeling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial modeling software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“er/studio”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 32 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,343 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,170 · 87 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 978
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 26 of 77 in financial modeling
Segment leader
14%
Microsoft Excel
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 13 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 13 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on erstudio.com
1,468
subdomains included
Content
565
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
25 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 247 | 19 | 2026-09-25 | Financial modeling | |
| Glossary or explainer | 133 | 0 | 2025-04-21 | ||
| Podcast or video | 113 | 7 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Report or ebook | 40 | 0 | 2026-05-18 | ||
| Comparison | 19 | 7 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Case study | 11 | 0 | 2024-12-02 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2026-04-24 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2026-05-07 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25From data model to database why ddl generation matters blog
- 2026-09-23Inherited an undocumented database reverse engineering makes it understandable again blog
- 2026-09-23Choosing the right powerdesigner alternative why er studio leads the way comparison
- 2026-09-17Best data modeling tools blog
- 2026-09-16Public sector data modeling blog
- 2026-09-14Before you trust ai data ready for ai podcast or video
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page erstudio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ER/Studio
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ER/Studio is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ER/Studio is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the most comprehensive data modeling suite, connecting data modeling with data governance to deliver a future-proof framework for your enterprise’s data
- For
- Data architects, data modelers, and governance teams
- Price stated
- Free Trial erstudio.com
- Starting price
- 2687.00 erstudio.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial erstudio.com
- Customers named
- CorrelaWerner EnterprisesProtective LifeCatalina MarketingEntrustTalkTalkAccoladeNewmont Corporation
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What ER/Studio's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: erstudio.com, erstudio.com/pricing, erstudio.com/platform, erstudio.com/resource-center/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ER/Studio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ER/Studio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ER/Studio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ER/Studio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ER/Studio, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.