Every category where a model named Intralinks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Virtual data rooms	Equity and corporate	0%	46 of 48	51%	39	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Intralinks yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Intralinks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	3	4
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	3	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	1	3	6
Kimi K2	1	1	0	4	6
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	3	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1	2	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct21 labels6

Paraphrase21 labels1

Comparative30 labels7not counted in share

Budget-constrained19 labels1

Scale-constrained24 labels2

Negative21 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative136 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“experts generally recommend sticking to established players with years of verified track records such as Intralinks, Datasite, Firmex, or Ansarada” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Virtual data rooms · negative prompt · first choice

“Intralinks (SS&C) — The Enterprise Standard ... Choose Intralinks/Datasite if: You're working on a large M&A deal” Kimi K2 · Virtual data rooms · comparative prompt · first choice

“Intralinks or Datasite are the standard choices because the cost is negligible compared to the risk” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Virtual data rooms · comparative prompt · first choice

“Intralinks is the other half of the M&A duopoly with Datasite” Muse Glimmer 30B · Virtual data rooms · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“One Capterra reviewer titled their review "Avoid Intralinks at all costs!" citing these issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Virtual data rooms · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid legacy per-page pricing (Intralinks, Datasite) unless doing large cross-border deals.” Kimi K2 · Virtual data rooms · direct prompt · hard negative

“Enterprise providers like Datasite or Intralinks: $5,000–$50,000+ per deal” Kimi K2 · Virtual data rooms · budget prompt · hard negative

“avoiding pricier options like Intralinks ($50k+ deals)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Virtual data rooms · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Intralinks, over the 136 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Intralinks was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Datasite Diligence117 of 13624Not among the top eight

Firmex70 of 13611Not among the top eight

iDeals68 of 13614Not among the top eight

SecureDocs54 of 13611Not among the top eight

Box38 of 1360Not among the top eight

Ansarada35 of 1361Not among the top eight

Peony Data Room32 of 13615Not among the top eight

DealRoom31 of 1363Not among the top eight

Digify26 of 1363Not among the top eight

Papermark25 of 1367Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Intralinks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 122 of the 136 answers that named Intralinks and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peony.ink101

papermark.com71

fast.io58

idealsvdr.com53

clinked.com52

ellty.com45

dataroom-providers.org42

firmroom.com41

g2.com35

learn.g2.com30

528 of the 528 domain citations in answers naming Intralinks came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

peony.ink/blog/top-10-virtual-data-room-providers89

clinked.com/virtual-data-room-providers51

fast.io/resources/virtual-data-room-providers47

idealsvdr.com/blog/virtual-data-room/best-virtual-data-rooms-compared34

firmroom.com/vdr-providers33

learn.g2.com/best-virtual-data-room-software30

bignewsnetwork.com/news/279338211/top-10-data-room-providers-the-ultimate-guide-for-busine28

papermark.com/blog/virtual-data-room-cost27

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

intralinks.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Intralinks takes 0% of first choices and iDeals takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “virtual data room”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “virtual data rooms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 14,800 a month (“intralinks”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 246 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 20,774 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,322 · 188 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,485
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

89 ads · 89 text · 43 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2023, as IntraLinks, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 25 in the year, 64 before. 9 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 46 of 48 in virtual data rooms

Segment leader

25%

iDeals

First choices: 10 across its categories
Named in: 136 answers
Its own site cited: in 122 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on intralinks.com

2,805

subdomains included

Content

1,372

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

68 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Report or ebook	577	2	2026-09-22	Virtual data rooms
Blog	325	1	2026-09-29	Virtual data rooms
Podcast or video	166	12	2026-09-16	Virtual data rooms
Case study	146	2	2026-09-30
Webinar or virtual event	129	undated
Comparison	13	undated
News or press	8	undated
Template or tool	6	undated
Conference or event	2	undated

Most recent

2026-09-30Venture capital firm secures fundraising docs case study
2026-09-30Global investment bank saves time ndas case study
2026-09-294 reasons life sciences ma due diligence blog
2026-09-222026 pe dealmaking report report or ebook
2026-09-182026 ma leaks report report or ebook
2026-09-162026 bayes leaks podcast or video

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page intralinks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Intralinks

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Intralinks; a claim can dispute any of them.

IntraLinks 1Intralinks (SS&C) 1Intralinks (VDRPro) 1Intralinks/Merrill 1

Follow Intralinks

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Intralinks is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: SS&C Intralinks enhances M&A dealmaking with AI-powered datarooms, offering seamless due diligence, compliance, and secure management of financial deals.
intralinks.com
For: firms across the capital markets and alternative investments landscape
intralinks.com
Certifications: ISO 27701
Customers named: RaytheonDowAnaplanWhole FoodsFortressTSG ConsumerNeuberger BermanRiverside
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Intralinks's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: intralinks.com, intralinks.com/tags/category/security, intralinks.com/products/via, intralinks.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Intralinks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Intralinks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Intralinks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Intralinks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Intralinks, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.