Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 102 → 36 of 109
1 category · Named, not rankedMercuryGate
9Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MercuryGate was named 4 times in Treasury management syst, where Trovata led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business34 of 117
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 124
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise63 of 90
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MercuryGate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 2% | 15 of 124 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MercuryGate held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Treasury management syst · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 8 → 13 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 29 → 56 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management syst | 5% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 15 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MercuryGate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MercuryGate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase9 labels1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest starting with Descartes or MercuryGate as they have strong mid-market presence” MiniMax M2.5 · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“MercuryGate – Best for 3PLs & Complex Operations” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Note: Recently acquired, so consider roadmap stability” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MercuryGate, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MercuryGate was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MercuryGate, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MercuryGate was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MercuryGate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named MercuryGate and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
elevatiq.com6
ratings.freightwaves.com5
connecteam.com4
g2.com4
gitnux.org4
solutionsreview.com4
suitefleet.com4
supplychainresearch.com4
capterra.com3
dashdoc.com3
Forty-one of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming MercuryGate came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
infios.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MercuryGate takes 2% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
infios.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MercuryGate takes 2% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “treasury management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “treasury management systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“mercurygate”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 26 a month
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 15 of 124 in treasury management syst
Segment leader
28%
Trovata
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 9 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 9 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on infios.com
1,742
subdomains included
Content
633
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 5
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 267 | 6 | 2026-08-27 | Treasury management syst | |
| News or press | 129 | 5 | 2026-09-09 | Treasury management syst | |
| Glossary or explainer | 117 | 0 | 2025-12-12 | Treasury management syst | |
| Case study | 73 | 0 | 2026-02-19 | Treasury management syst | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 24 | undated | Treasury management syst | ||
| Conference or event | 12 | 0 | 2021-09-30 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | Treasury management syst | |
| Template or tool | 5 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-09Infios named a leader in the idc marketscape for worldwide transportation management systems 2026 vendor assessment news or press
- 2026-09-01Logistik schmitt extends strategic partnership with infios through yard management deployment news or press
- 2026-08-27The reactive tariff pattern is back blog
- 2026-08-14How supply chain leaders modernize execution without breaking what works blog
- 2026-08-12Infios named a leader in the idc marketscape news or press
- 2026-08-12A carrier went dark at dawn heres what your ai should do next blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page infios.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow MercuryGate
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MercuryGate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MercuryGate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MercuryGate by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MercuryGate is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MercuryGate, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.