Every category where a model named myTransferPricing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Transfer pricing	Tax and compliance	8%	5 of 101	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by TPGenie at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for myTransferPricing yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated myTransferPricing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained7 labels7

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall for Low Budget: myTransferPricing ... Start with myTransferPricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Transfer pricing · budget prompt · first choice

“myTransferPricing is one of the most cost-effective platforms on the market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Transfer pricing · budget prompt · first choice

“myTransferPricing — Best Overall Value” Kimi K2 · Transfer pricing · budget prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: myTransferPricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Transfer pricing · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as myTransferPricing, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and myTransferPricing was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Commenda8 of 100Not among the top eight

TPGenie6 of 101Not among the top eight

Caribou4 of 101Not among the top eight

Exactera Transfer Pricing4 of 101Not among the top eight

PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing3 of 100Not among the top eight

TPdoc3 of 100Not among the top eight

Aibidia2 of 100Not among the top eight

Reptune2 of 100Not among the top eight

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE2 of 100Not among the top eight

ArmsLength AI1 of 100Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named myTransferPricing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named myTransferPricing and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mytransferpricing.comYour site9

getsphere.com8

itechguides.com7

sourceforge.net7

commenda.io6

gitnux.org6

g2.com5

intrapricing.com4

slashdot.org4

zipdo.co4

Fifty-one of the sixty domain citations in answers naming myTransferPricing came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getsphere.com/blog/best-transfer-pricing-software-for-compliance8

mytransferpricing.com/tools7

gitnux.org/best/transfer-pricing-software6

commenda.io/transfer-pricing5

itechguides.com/best/transfer-pricing-software5

mytransferpricing.com/5

mytransferpricing.com/for-tax-teams5

g2.com/categories/transfer-pricing4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mytransferpricing.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, myTransferPricing takes 8% of first choices and TPGenie takes 30%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “transfer pricing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “transfer pricing platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“mytransferpricing”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 6 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 465
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 101 in transfer pricing

Segment leader

30%

TPGenie

First choices: 7 across its categories
Named in: 10 answers
Its own site cited: in 10 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on mytransferpricing.com

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	8	5	2026-09-26	Transfer pricing
Template or tool	2	undated
Glossary or explainer	1	0	2026-04-02	Transfer pricing

Most recent

2026-09-26Tax ai harness 05 blog
2026-09-25Tax ai harness 04 blog
2026-09-24Tax ai harness 03 blog
2026-09-23Tax ai harness 02 blog
2026-09-21Tax ai harness 01 blog
2026-04-18Tax ai harness 00 blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mytransferpricing.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow myTransferPricing

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

myTransferPricing is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-first transfer pricing platform for advisory firms and in-house tax teams.
mytransferpricing.com
For: advisory firms and in-house tax teams
mytransferpricing.com
Price stated: Usage-based pricing: AI provider token cost + 10% platform fee. No fixed fees. mytransferpricing.com
Free plan or trial: Free without AI mytransferpricing.com
Hosting: Frankfurt
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, certifications, customers

What myTransferPricing's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: mytransferpricing.com, mytransferpricing.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when myTransferPricing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as myTransferPricing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for myTransferPricing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where myTransferPricing is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name myTransferPricing, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.