AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Quasa · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Quasa

1Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Quasa was named 1 time in Telecom expense mgmt, where Genuity led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In telecom expense mgmt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Quasa for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Telecom expense managementSpend and procurement0%56 of 890%1under 10 labels · led by Genuity at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Quasa yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Quasa across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Invoice & Lifecycle Management: Quasa (Clearview)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Telecom expense mgmt · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quasa, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quasa was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Lightyear.ai1 of 11Not among the top eight
Calero1 of 10Not among the top eight
Spenza1 of 10Not among the top eight
Tangoe One Telecom1 of 10Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quasa. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Quasa and are not a share of its labels.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on quasa.io
16,493
subdomains included
Content
937
counted in the table below
Documentation
33
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog736892026-10-05Expense management
Comparison94692026-10-05
Report or ebook47382026-10-05
Podcast or video42352026-10-05
Conference or event552026-10-04
Template or tool552026-09-07
Webinar or virtual event312026-07-10
Glossary or explainer302026-06-15
Case study102026-06-06
News or press112026-08-03
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page quasa.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Quasa

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Quasa; a claim can dispute any of them.
Quasa (Clearview) 1

Follow Quasa

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Quasa is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
One connected ecosystem for multilingual technology media, digital-product discovery, rewards, work opportunities and selected uses of QUA.
For
A global community of builders and explorers
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Quasa's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: quasa.io, quasa.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quasa's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quasa, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quasa by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Quasa is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Quasa, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quasa.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.