| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer pricing | Tax and compliance | 4% | 6 of 101 | 13% | 15 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“described as a fit "when mid-size tax and finance teams need repeatable documentation workflow across multiple" jurisdictions... listed as the runner-up for mid-size teams” Muse Glimmer 30B · Transfer pricing · direct prompt · first choice
“Pick Sovos Transfer Pricing for standardized multi-jurisdiction workflows and integrated global tax compliance” Muse Glimmer 30B · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Sovos Transfer Pricing suits mid-size teams standardizing repeatable workflows across multiple jurisdictions” Muse Glimmer 30B · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Mid-size teams standardizing repeatable workflows across multiple jurisdictions” MiniMax M2.5 · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Other mentions like Sovos (good for multi-jurisdiction standardization) ... are viable but lean more enterprise or niche.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“rather than the enterprise suites such as ONE SOURCE, Exactera, Sovos, etc.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Transfer pricing · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 47 answers that named Sovos Transfer Pricing and are not a share of its labels.
263 of the 263 domain citations in answers naming Sovos Transfer Pricing came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sovos Transfer Pricing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sovos Transfer Pricing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sovos Transfer Pricing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: