| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer pricing | Tax and compliance | 4% | 8 of 101 | 18% | 11 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ONESOURCE ranks third because it unifies indirect tax with direct tax, provision, and transfer pricing, giving multinational tax departments one system covering more than 190 countries.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · first choice
“For large, global teams needing a full suite: Thomson Reuters or Wolters Kluwer.” Mistral Small · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Widely considered the market leader, ONESOURCE offers a modular approach.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing” GPT-5.4 mini · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Mid-market companies or firms with simpler structures will find it overbuilt and expensive... The platform's biggest weakness is its implementation burden.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Transfer pricing · negative prompt · soft negative
“typically priced at $75,000–$500,000+/year, which is generally overkill (and overbudget) for most mid-sized B2B companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing and are not a share of its labels.
120 of the 133 domain citations in answers naming Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: