Numeric vs Workiva
Zero of fourteen models named Numeric first on the direct prompt; one named Workiva. Numeric was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Workiva by eleven and Numeric carries 44 labels and Workiva 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in eleven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial close management page.
By framing
NumericFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkiva
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Numeric Workiva first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Numeric on the left and Workiva on the right.The direct prompt
Workiva first, Numeric an alternative
1 of 14 modelsNumeric was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Numeric25%#1 of 11Workiva0%#9 of 11Numeric4%#5 of 8Workiva4%#4 of 8What the models said about Numeric
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Noted as becoming expensive/unpredictable at scale (e.g., $360K+/month for thousands of users).” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Smaller user community; fewer integrations compared with FloQast/Workiva. Still evolving” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Numeric – Can become expensive and unpredictable with thousands of users.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Numeric if you are a modern, fast-growing company that wants to leverage AI to automate transactional matching” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Workiva
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Often criticized as overly complex and expensive for non-enterprise or mid-market needs; ... avoid if scalability or cost is a concern.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.