Small business▼−13Since September 2026: 36% → 23%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
23%from 36% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 3 pointsRank 1 of 88, unchanged
4 categories · RankedNumeric
219Judge labels
42First choices
23Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
25% in Financial close manageme for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 85 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 44 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Numeric →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 92
25%41 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 85
15%44 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 75
4%21 labels
criticized challenger
In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Numeric for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 15% | 2 of 85 | 7% | 44 | accepted challenger | ▼−7Since September 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 10% | 3 of 82 | 0% | 37 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 7% | 6 of 85 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 37 of 102 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Numeric held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial close manageme · by segment
Mid-market▼−7Since September 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 19% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 2 of 77, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 5 of 71, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close manageme | 19% | 12% | ▼−7Since September 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 85, unchanged |
| Account reconciliation | 14% | 9% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 82 |
| AI accounting assistants | 7% | 5% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 of 85, unchanged |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 102, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Numeric across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Numeric across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 17 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct42 labels9
Paraphrase37 labels10
Comparative55 labels11not counted in share
Budget-constrained35 labels17
Scale-constrained27 labels6
Negative23 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative219 labels in all, every segment counted; 42 of the 56 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Numeric if you are a modern, fast-growing company that wants to leverage AI to automate transactional matching” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial close manageme · comparative prompt · first choice
“prioritize tools with easy setup, AI matching, and compliance (e.g., for mid-market: Numeric or simpler options)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Account reconciliation · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Numeric if you want modern AI-driven automation at a more accessible price point” Kimi K2 · Account reconciliation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Numeric if your main need is month-end close, reconciliation, and financial reporting” Perplexity Sonar · AI accounting assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Noted as becoming expensive/unpredictable at scale (e.g., $360K+/month for thousands of users).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial close manageme · negative prompt · soft negative
“Smaller user community; fewer integrations compared with FloQast/Workiva. Still evolving” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial close manageme · direct prompt · soft negative
“Numeric – Can become expensive and unpredictable with thousands of users.” Mistral Small · Financial close manageme · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Numeric, over the 219 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Numeric was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Numeric, over the 219 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Numeric was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Numeric. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 218 of the 219 answers that named Numeric and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
numeric.ioYour site180
bluecopa.com95
prophix.com75
guideflow.com74
g2.com68
maxima.ai67
learn.g2.com63
highradius.com55
ramp.com55
cfoshortlist.com51
603 of the 783 domain citations in answers naming Numeric came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
numeric.io ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Numeric takes 15% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.ShowHide
Search and answers
numeric.io ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Numeric takes 15% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “close management tools”
3
Position for “financial close management software”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“numeric”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 38,006 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 94,254 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,940 · 599 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,750
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 10 clicks and $426 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
15%
rank 2 of 85 in financial close manageme
Segment leader
55%
FloQast
- First choices
- 42 across its categories
- Named in
- 219 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 218 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on numeric.io
811
subdomains included
Content
366
counted in the table below
Documentation
153
Product · Integration
24 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 175 | undated | Account reconciliation, Revenue recognition | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 118 | undated | Accounts receivable auto, Cash application | ||
| Template or tool | 41 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 12 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 11 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 6 | undated | |||
| Case study | 1 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 17, 2026Inflection Summit by NumericThe Hibernia, San Francisco · hosted
As the event pages on numeric.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page numeric.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Numeric
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Numeric; a claim can dispute any of them.
Numeric (formerly Guideflow) 1Numeric Essentials 1
Follow Numeric
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Numeric is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Numeric is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The data platform for finance teams.
- For
- finance teams
- Price stated
- We take several pieces of information and business context into account, from number of transactions to number of seats, to come up with a holistic pricing plan that fits your business needs. numeric.io/pricing
- Certifications
- ASC 606 compliancecertification program
- Customers named
- STASHGOATBrexPlaidRiskifiedPublic.comWealthfrontParafin
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Numeric's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: numeric.io, numeric.io/pricing, numeric.io/product/close, numeric.io/customer-stories, numeric.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Numeric's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Numeric, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Numeric by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Numeric is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Numeric, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Numeric is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Numeric is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideFinancial close management
Numeric is among the products AI models recommend first in Financial close management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Account reconciliation
Numeric is among the products AI models recommend first in Account reconciliation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.