Six of fourteen models named Sage Fixed Assets first on the direct prompt; zero named Fixed Asset Pro. Sage Fixed Assets was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Fixed Asset Pro by eleven and Sage Fixed Assets carries 52 labels and Fixed Asset Pro 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the fixed asset accounting page.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | FA | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | FA | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | FA | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | FA | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | FA | FA | ||||
| Kimi K2 | FA | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | FA | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | FA | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | FA |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Often inadequate for complex needs—lacking full lifecycle coverage, physical verification, or robust depreciation.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Also flagged for per-user pricing, which can drive up costs... the pricing model is a common point of caution.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Per-user pricing inflates costs; some users report challenges with multi-state assets or scalability” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Sage Fixed Assets | Accounting teams needing controlled depreciation, audit trails, and period-end integration | Mature depreciation engine” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Sage Fixed Assets, especially if your team needs solid depreciation handling, audit-friendly reporting, and room to grow.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Sage positions its fixed asset suite this way, emphasizing 50+ depreciation methods, tax compliance updates, and lifecycle management.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid if you have high-volume disposals or need GAAP/financial statement accuracy on disposal.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Lacks custom reports, no direct ERP integration (requires manual exports), update/install frustrations, occasional depreciation errors” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like Fixed Asset Pro or basic modules within smaller accounting suites often require you to manually export journal entries” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tightest cash outlay, accounting-focused: Fixed Asset Pro. $499 one-time + ~$199-$249 annual renewal is the lowest total cost of ownership cited” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Fixed Asset Pro as a strong, cost-effective choice for asset depreciation tracking.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Fixed Asset Pro offers the best long-term value for serious fixed asset management” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.