| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 9% | 4 of 107 | 29% | 21 | criticized challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed asset accounting | 9% | 7% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 4 of 107 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tightest cash outlay, accounting-focused: Fixed Asset Pro. $499 one-time + ~$199-$249 annual renewal is the lowest total cost of ownership cited” Muse Glimmer 30B · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Fixed Asset Pro as a strong, cost-effective choice for asset depreciation tracking.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Fixed asset accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Fixed Asset Pro offers the best long-term value for serious fixed asset management” Kimi K2 · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“Fixed Asset Pro | Best Value | Annual Flat Fee (~$500/yr)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid if you have high-volume disposals or need GAAP/financial statement accuracy on disposal.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · hard negative
“Lacks custom reports, no direct ERP integration (requires manual exports), update/install frustrations, occasional depreciation errors” Grok 4.1 Fast · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like Fixed Asset Pro or basic modules within smaller accounting suites often require you to manually export journal entries” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some versions have bugs; forced upgrades to maintain support; "not very visually pleasing"” Kimi K2 · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 43 answers that named Fixed Asset Pro and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for Fixed Asset Pro, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fixed Asset Pro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fixed Asset Pro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fixed Asset Pro by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: