AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Planning and analysis › Board › BoardSpace vs Diligent Boards
Board and investor reporting · October 2026 Edition

BoardSpace vs Diligent Boards

Zero of fourteen models named BoardSpace first on the direct prompt; one named Diligent Boards. BoardSpace was named by nine of the fourteen models and Diligent Boards by thirteen and BoardSpace carries 10 labels and Diligent Boards 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.

BoardSpace

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Diligent Boards

criticized challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%50%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels1040A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, BoardSpace reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. OnBoard vs BoardSpace · OnBoard vs Diligent Boards · Boardable vs BoardSpace

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BoardSpaceFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDiligent Boards
Direct012 against Diligent Boards
Paraphrase00
Comparative06
Budget-constrained207 against Diligent Boards
Scale-constrained002 against Diligent Boards
Negative009 against Diligent Boards
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where BoardSpace and Diligent Boards stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
BoardSpace Diligent Boards first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, BoardSpace on the left and Diligent Boards on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where BoardSpace and Diligent Boards stood in it.

Diligent Boards first, BoardSpace not the choice

1 of 14 modelsBoardSpace was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniDiligent Boards alternatives: BoardPaq, Boardable, Nasdaq Boardvantage

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Kimi K2OnBoard alternatives: Diligent Boards, Govenda, Nasdaq Boardvantage, Zeck
GLM 4.7 FlashXAppDeck Board Portal, OnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardPro, Diligent Boards

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Govenda
Gemini 3.5 FlashDatarails, Mosaic alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardPro, Cube, OnBoard
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Grok 4.1 FastOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Boardable, Govenda
Mistral SmallGovenda, OnBoard alternatives: Boardable, ClearPoint Strategy
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Boardable, Govenda
Llama 4 MaverickOnBoard alternatives: Kluster
Qwen 3.7 FlashOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, Kluster
MiniMax M2.5OnBoard, Prophix alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, Boardable
GPT-6 LunaCube alternatives: Jirav, OnBoard
Muse Glimmer 30BOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Boardable, Cube, Datarails, Planful, Prophix

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
BoardSpace leads by two points.
BoardSpace2%#– of 8
Diligent Boards0%#8 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
BoardSpace leads by two points.
BoardSpace4%#4 of 8
Diligent Boards2%#6 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
BoardSpace is not named for this buyer.
Diligent Boards30%#1 of 7
BoardSpace—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about BoardSpace

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“It is often cited as one of the most accessible options for smaller organizations... Starting around $69 per month” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Boardable or BoardSpace would be the top recommendations” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Diligent Boards

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Industry-standard governance platform with AI-powered meeting summaries... If you're a large public company needing full GRC: → Diligent” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for: Enterprise governance and secure board portals ... Strengths: Strong security, comprehensive governance features” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.