AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Planning and analysis › Corporate performance ma › Planful vs Cube
Corporate performance management · October 2026 Edition

Planful vs Cube

Nine of fourteen models named Planful first on the direct prompt; two named Cube. Planful was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Cube by ten and Planful carries 41 labels and Cube 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Planful

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

Cube

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

First-choice share22%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4121A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Planful reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Prophix was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Planful vs Prophix · Planful vs Vena · Planful vs Workday Adaptive Planning

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate performance management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PlanfulFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCube
Direct92
Paraphrase30
Comparative00
Budget-constrained131 against Planful
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Cube
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Planful and Cube were named in the same answer 141 times, of the 370 answers naming Planful and the 365 naming Cube. In those answers Cube took the first choice twenty-five times and Planful eleven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Planful and Cube stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Planful Cube first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Planful on the left and Cube on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Planful and Cube stood in it.

Planful first, Cube an alternative

9 of 14 modelsCube was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniPlanful, Vena alternatives: Board, Jedox, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Perplexity SonarPlanful alternatives: Datarails, Drivetrain, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning
Grok 4.1 FastPlanful, Prophix alternatives: OneStream, Workday Adaptive Planning
DeepSeek V4 FlashPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Pigment, Prophix, Vena
Llama 4 MaverickPlanful alternatives: Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning
Qwen 3.7 FlashPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Prophix
MiniMax M2.5Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Cube, Prophix, Vena
GPT-6 LunaPlanful alternatives: NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Muse Glimmer 30BPlanful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Workday Adaptive Planning

Cube first, Planful an alternative

2 of 14 modelsPlanful was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCube, Vena alternatives: Abacum, Datarails, Mosaic, Pigment, Planful, Prophix
GLM 4.7 FlashXCube, Prophix alternatives: Planful

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Drivetrain alternatives: Jedox, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Kimi K2Datarails, Drivetrain, Vena alternatives: Cube, Planful, Prophix

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Mistral SmallProfitbase EPM, Prophix alternatives: IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Phocas Software

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Cube leads by thirteen points.
Cube15%#1 of 13
Planful2%#8 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Planful leads at mid-market.
Planful22%#1 of 14
Cube8%#5 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Planful0%#7 of 12
Cube0%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Planful

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Primary recommendation: Planful – best blend of speed, functionality, and price for most mid‑sized B2B firms” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Planful is the sweet spot. It's built for mid-market, doesn't require consultants to implement” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Cube

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Excel/Google Sheets-like interface; quick setup for forecasting/reporting; good for startups/small finance teams avoiding big implementations.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.