Corporate performance management for small business buyers
Asked as “EPM software”, and as “corporate performance management platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
15%
Contested · Vena 11%
15Cube11Vena06Centage68others
15% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−1Since September 2026: 16% → 15%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Cube held the lead, −1 point on 16%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Cube15%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 16% → 15%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-market
Planful22%Contested▼−7Since September 2026: 29% → 21%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Anaplan30%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Anaplan (28%) replaces OneStream (30% then, 17% now), 11 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →
Cube15%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 16% → 15%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketPlanful22%Contested▼−7Since September 2026: 29% → 21%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseAnaplan30%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Anaplan (28%) replaces OneStream (30% then, 17% now), 11 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Cube15%3%30accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 16% → 15%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 15%
Cube15%3%30accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 16% → 15%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 15%02
Vena11%11%27accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 9%
Vena11%11%27accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 9%03
Datarails6%11%18accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 7%
Datarails6%11%18accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 7%04
Jirav6%0%13accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Jirav6%0%13accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%05
Jedox4%0%10accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Jedox4%0%10accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%06
Workday Adaptive Planning4%43%35criticized challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 11% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 4%
Workday Adaptive Planning4%43%35criticized challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 11% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 4%07
Prophix2%10%21accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
Prophix2%10%21accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%08Planful2%11%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Planful2%11%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
Oracle Hyperion0%91%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Oracle Hyperion0%91%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
SAP BPC0%91%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SAP BPC0%91%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%83%36criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%83%36criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13Anaplan0%82%40criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Anaplan0%82%40criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
OneStream0%82%22criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
OneStream0%82%22criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Planful vs CubePlanful vs DatarailsPlanful vs JedoxPlanful vs PigmentProphix vs VenaProphix vs Workday Adaptive PlanningProphix vs CubeProphix vs DatarailsProphix vs JedoxProphix vs PigmentVena vs Workday Adaptive PlanningVena vs CubeVena vs DatarailsVena vs JedoxVena vs PigmentWorkday Adaptive Planning vs CubeWorkday Adaptive Planning vs DatarailsWorkday Adaptive Planning vs JedoxWorkday Adaptive Planning vs PigmentCube vs DatarailsCube vs JedoxCube vs PigmentDatarails vs JedoxDatarails vs PigmentJedox vs Pigment
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Cube15%
Cube15%02Vena11%
Vena11%03Datarails6%
Datarails6%04Jirav6%
Jirav6%05Jedox4%
Jedox4%06Workday Adaptive Planning4%
Workday Adaptive Planning4%07Prophix2%
Prophix2%08Planful2%
Planful2%09Oracle Hyperion0%
Oracle Hyperion0%10SAP BPC0%
SAP BPC0%11OneStream0%
OneStream0%12Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%13Anaplan0%
Anaplan0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM83%
30 of 36 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 18 hard negative
“Frequently criticized for its **high licensing, implementation, and customization costs** ... overwhelming for simple forecasting or budgeting in smaller teams” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Anaplan82%
33 of 40 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 13 hard negative
“top choice for what NOT to buy if you are a small business.** ... Anaplan is usually "overkill," making the ROI difficult to justify.`” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
OneStream82%
18 of 22 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“high licensing and implementation costs, and its complexity is often cited as a barrier for smaller operations” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Workday Adaptive Planning43%
15 of 35 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“What I'd Avoid: Workday Adaptive Planning – powerful but overkill and overpriced for small businesses” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1120 links across 232 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 35 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · PeopleGoal46 answers · 48 citations · 12 models
40 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware39 answers · 65 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Drivetrain26 answers · 28 citations · 12 models
25 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Kanbanchi18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
38 answers · 10 models
37 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best epm software”, “epm platforms”, “epm software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 15% | 349 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | 1 | |
| Vena venasolutions.com | 11% | 344 | 12,100 | 3,928 | 62,294 | $13,792 | 58 | |
| Datarails datarails.com | 6% | 303 | 6,600 | 134 | 18,964 | $16,697 | 107 | 6 |
| Jirav jirav.com | 6% | 151 | 720 | 15 | 3,780 | 2 | ||
| Centage centage.com | 6% | 36 | 1,000 | 11 | 1,692 | 6 | ||
| Zoho parent site Zoho People 6% | 6% | 4 | 6,600 | 50 | ||||
| Jedox jedox.com | 4% | 51 | 720 | 3 | 9,363 | $14 | 18 | 9 |
| PlanGuru planguru.com | 4% | 17 | ||||||
| IBM ibm.com IBM Planning Analytics 4% | 4% | 73 | 201,000 | 34,098 | 31,137,701 company | $2,518 | 118 | 6 |
| Workday workday.com Workday Adaptive Planning 4% | 4% | 407 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 company | 80 | 5 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cubesoftware.com, drivetrain.ai, peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best epm software” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best EPM software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which corporate performance management platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top EPM platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best EPM software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a EPM software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which EPM platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5DatarailsLatticeChangedDatarailsagainst: AnaplanCubeagainst: Datarailsno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday
Three alternatives
Jedox, Prophix, VenaTwo alternatives
BambooHR, Small ImprovementsThree alternatives
Jedox, Prophix, VenaOne alternative
LimelightGPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: AnaplanDatarailsChangedWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle HyperionWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP advanced profitability/performance toolsno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle-based enterprise planning tools / legacy enterprise suites, Pigment, SAP enterprise planning / ERP-centered suites, Workday Adaptive Planning
One alternative
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMThree alternatives
Board, CaptivateIQ, ProphixTwo alternatives
Board, VenaOne alternative
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMGemini 3.5 FlashCube, Datarailsagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPCMosaicChangedCube, Datarailsagainst: OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPCFathomagainst: Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, Pigment, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
Aleph, Bob Finance, Clockwork, Jirav, RunwaySix alternatives
15Five, Clockwork, Effy AI, Fathom, Jirav, PeopleGoalFour alternatives
Aleph, Clockwork, Jirav, RunwayThree alternatives
Clockwork, Datarails, JiravSix alternatives
Aleph, Causal, Cube, Datarails, Jirav, RunwayPerplexity SonarJedoxagainst: OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMProfit.coChangedProofHubIBM Planning Analytics, LivePlanagainst: CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC
Two alternatives
Anaplan, VenaThree alternatives
Cube, Lattice, ThriveSparrowFive alternatives
Asana, ClickUp, Kanbanchi, Teamwork.com, WrikeThree alternatives
Cube, Essbase, ProphixGrok 4.1 FastVenaagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAPCentageChangedagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMCube, Datarailsagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, SAPCubeagainst: Anaplan, Apache Fineract, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAPagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Anaplan, Cube, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Abacum, BambooHR, Cube, JedoxTwo alternatives
Prophix, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Centage, Datarails, Planful, VenaOne alternative
PlanfulMistral SmallJedox, VenaCentage, SolverChangedCube, Monday.comagainst: AnaplanZoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Jedox, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMTwo alternatives
OneStream, ProphixFour alternatives
15Five, Effy AI, PeopleGoal, Small ImprovementsDeepSeek V4 FlashCubeCentageChangedagainst: Anaplan, BambooHR, Lattice, OneStream, Planful, Trakstar, Workday Adaptive PlanningCubeagainst: Workday Adaptive PlanningCubeagainst: Anaplan, OneStreamKepionagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Planful, Prophix, VenaTwo alternatives
Abacum, VenaFive alternatives
Centage, Jirav, Mosaic, Prophix, VenaFive alternatives
15Five, Datarails, Lattice, PeopleGoal, Zoho PeopleThree alternatives
Jedox, Planful, ProphixLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldProphixagainst: OneStreamZoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
One alternative
BambooHRTwo alternatives
IBM Planning Analytics, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Oracle Primavera P6, ProofHubQwen 3.7 FlashVenaCubeChangedagainst: VenaFloatagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAPCorbexagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAPFloat, Venaagainst: Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPCagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Datarails, Pulse AI, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
15Five, Lattice, PlanfulThree alternatives
Fathom, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Fathom, Float, Pilot, SpreadSimpleThree alternatives
Drivetrain, Prophix, Sage ElmoKimi K2Cubeagainst: IBM Planning AnalyticsJiravChangedagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningCubeagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, SAPIBM Planning Analyticsagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix, Vena, WorkdayJiravagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC
Two alternatives
Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Cube, FathomFour alternatives
Datarails, Mosaic, Prophix, VenaTwo alternatives
Cube, LimelightThree alternatives
Cube, Datarails, VenaGLM 4.7 FlashXPlanGuruagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, ProphixHubSpot Sales Hub, PipedriveChangedagainst: Anaplan, Microsoft Power BI, Microsoft Project, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Primavera, SAPAsanaagainst: WrikeLiveFlowMonday.com, Smartsheet, Wrikeagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud
Two alternatives
Budgyt, FloatSeven alternatives
15Five, HubSpot All-in-One Suite, Lattice, QuickBooks Online, Zoho Analytics, Zoho Books, Zoho OneThree alternatives
ClickUp, Monday.com, SmartsheetSix alternatives
15Five, Effy AI, IBM Planning Analytics, Monday.com, PerformYard, SAP BusinessObjects Edge BIMiniMax M2.5Planful, Prophixagainst: Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceChangedCubeagainst: AnaplanZoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Four alternatives
ClickUp, Lark, Monday.com, Workday Adaptive PlanningGPT-6 LunaCubeagainst: Workday Adaptive PlanningJiravChangedJiravagainst: Adaptive from Workday, PigmentPlanGuruagainst: Cube, Datarailsno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAP Analytics Cloud Planning
One alternative
CentageThree alternatives
Cube, Mosaic, NetSuite Planning and BudgetingOne alternative
Excel or Google Sheets modelMuse Glimmer 30BPigment, Venaagainst: Anaplan, Essbase, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMVenaChangedPlanfulagainst: VenaEffy AIagainst: BeyondTrust, CyberArkno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPC
Two alternatives
Kepion, PlanfulOne alternative
DrivetrainFive alternatives
Cube, Futrli, Jirav, Prophix, Quick ConsolsFive alternatives
Admin By Request, CyberFOX AutoElevate, Monday.com, PeopleGoal, Small ImprovementsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:04 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 23 | 54 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 16 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 11 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 20 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 23 | 83 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 19 | 101 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 11 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 22 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 12 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:31 | no | 0 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 19 | 167 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 8 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 19 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 16 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 15 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 12 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:27 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 23 | 87 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:05 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:56 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:02 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 13 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 7 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:14 | yes | 22 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 21 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 13 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 19 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 21 | 22 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Adaptive Insights (Workday) read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Clockwork.ai read as Clockwork
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM (including Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Enterprise read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Prophix One read as Prophix
SAP BPC read as SAP BPC
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Adaptive from Workday
Apache Fineract
CaptivateIQ
Corbex
Drivet
Everstage
Excel or Google Sheets model
Excel-based solutions with Power BI
Heimdal
HubSpot All-in-One Suite
Oracle NetSuite EPM
Oracle-based enterprise planning tools / legacy enterprise suites
Primavera
Profit.co
Pulse AI
SAP BusinessObjects Edge BI
SAP advanced profitability/performance tools
SAP enterprise planning / ERP-centered suites
Sage Elmo
Salesforce Sales Performance Management
SpreadSimple
Taito.ai
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.