Nine of fourteen models named ChartMogul first on the direct prompt; one named Maxio Metrics. ChartMogul was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Maxio Metrics by twelve and ChartMogul carries 65 labels and Maxio Metrics 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the saas metrics and analytics page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, ChartMogul and Maxio Metrics were named in the same answer fifty-nine times, of the 189 answers naming ChartMogul and the 63 naming Maxio Metrics. In those answers Maxio Metrics took the first choice nine times and ChartMogul thirty-one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid Baremetrics, basic ChartMogul, basic ProfitWell, and Tableau” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“criticize it for assuming simple sales processes, leading to poor fits for complex revenue recognition or cohorts” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Metric discrepancies - Users frequently report that ChartMogul's numbers don't always match their billing system” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend either ChartMogul for focused revenue metrics or Mixpanel/HubSpot if you want to connect product behavior to ARR” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“has been the gold standard for SaaS metrics since 2014 and is the most powerful option for companies with complex billing needs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“ChartMogul and Databox are the top recommendations due to their ease of use, strong feature sets, and affordability.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“implementing them too early can choke a startup... Avoid complex enterprise financial suites until you are scaling past $5M–$10M ARR” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“That broader scope may be unnecessary if all you need is basic recurring-revenue reporting” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Maxio is the strongest standalone recommendation” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Maxio is the heavy-hitter for mid-market SaaS.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Recommended: Maxio (Chargify + SaaSOptics)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.