AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › ChartMogul · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

ChartMogul

189Judge labels
65First choices
29Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
53% in SaaS metrics for small business buyers
Rank 1 of 78 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
9 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 65 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ChartMogul →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In saas metrics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ChartMogul for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SaaS metrics and analyticsPlanning and analysis49%1 of 7812%65endorsed leader▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Financial reporting and dashboardsPlanning and analysis0%59 of 1050%1under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, ChartMogul held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · SaaS metrics · by segment

Small business▲+14Since September 2026: 37% → 51%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
51%from 37% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 4 pointsRank 1 of 80, unchanged
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
48%from 45% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 1 of 75, unchanged
Enterprise▲+4Since September 2026: 19% → 22%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 19% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 1 of 99, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
SaaS metrics45%48%▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 1 of 78, unchanged
Financial reporting0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 50 → 59 of 105

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated ChartMogul across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.520002
GPT-5.4 mini21003
Gemini 3.5 Flash41106
Perplexity Sonar31015
Grok 4.1 Fast22116
Mistral Small10214
DeepSeek V4 Flash32005
Llama 4 Maverick00213
Qwen 3.7 Flash14106
Kimi K240015
GLM 4.7 FlashX22015
MiniMax M2.541016
GPT-6 Luna31015
Muse Glimmer 30B31105

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct36 labels25
Paraphrase37 labels27
Comparative39 labels23not counted in share
Budget-constrained33 labels10
Scale-constrained12 labels3
Negative32 labels6not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative189 labels in all, every segment counted; 65 of the 94 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend either ChartMogul for focused revenue metrics or Mixpanel/HubSpot if you want to connect product behavior to ARR” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SaaS metrics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“has been the gold standard for SaaS metrics since 2014 and is the most powerful option for companies with complex billing needs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SaaS metrics · comparative prompt · first choice
“ChartMogul and Databox are the top recommendations due to their ease of use, strong feature sets, and affordability.” Mistral Small · SaaS metrics · direct prompt · first choice
“Final Verdict: For a growing mid-market B2B company, start with ChartMogul to get the subscription metrics right.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SaaS metrics · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Baremetrics, basic ChartMogul, basic ProfitWell, and Tableau” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative
“criticize it for assuming simple sales processes, leading to poor fits for complex revenue recognition or cohorts” Grok 4.1 Fast · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative
“Metric discrepancies - Users frequently report that ChartMogul's numbers don't always match their billing system” Kimi K2 · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative
“one guide explicitly says ChartMogul can be overkill for that use case and suggests lighter options instead” Perplexity Sonar · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ChartMogul, over the 189 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ChartMogul was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Mixpanel88 of 1895Not among the top eight
Tableau43 of 1891Not among the top eight
PostHog40 of 1891Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power BI39 of 1891Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ChartMogul. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 177 of the 189 answers that named ChartMogul and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

baremetrics.com141
designrevision.com97
databox.com87
saashero.net47
cometly.com44
finance-ai-index.com43
chartmogul.comYour site37
indinero.com37
younium.com36
portermetrics.com35

567 of the 604 domain citations in answers naming ChartMogul came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where ChartMogul stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “saas metrics tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “saas metrics dashboard”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,000 a month (“chartmogul”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 4,467 a month
Searches its site ranks for
924 · 63 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,331
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
2 ads · 1 image, 1 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2026, as ChartMogul GmbH & Co. KG, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 2 in the year. 2 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
49%
rank 1 of 78 in saas metrics
First choices
65
across its categories
Named in
189 answers
Its own site cited
in 177 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on chartmogul.com
1,863
subdomains included
Content
686
counted in the table below
Documentation
279
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog58142026-08-24Revenue recognition
Report or ebook5112026-07-15
Webinar or virtual event2302025-09-16
Case study18undated
Conference or event502023-06-16
Comparison502024-01-11
Glossary or explainer202021-07-02
Podcast or video102015-07-29

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page chartmogul.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as ChartMogul

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ChartMogul; a claim can dispute any of them.
ChartMogul Free 2

Follow ChartMogul

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ChartMogul is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI-native stack for subscription intelligence
For
subscription business
Price stated
Pro: $1,188 $2,088 $2,988 $5,388 $8,388 $11,388 $14,388 per year, billed annually. Enterprise: From $19,900 per year, billed annually. chartmogul.com/pricing
Starting price
1188 chartmogul.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
14-day trial; Free plan at no cost for startups under $120K ARR. chartmogul.com/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type II certifiedGDPR compliant
Hosting
Europe regionAWS EU Ireland Region (eu-west-1)
Customers named
OneVisionQwilrKitchn
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What ChartMogul's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: chartmogul.com, chartmogul.com/pricing, chartmogul.com/security, chartmogul.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ChartMogul's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ChartMogul, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ChartMogul by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ChartMogul is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ChartMogul, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at chartmogul.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where ChartMogul is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

AI models recommend ChartMogul first in SaaS metrics and analytics this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
AI models' first choice in SaaS metrics and analytics, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/planning/saas-metrics-and-analytics/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/chartmogul--saas-metrics-and-analytics-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in SaaS metrics and analytics, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SaaS metrics and analytics standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
AI models' first choice in SaaS metrics and analytics, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/planning/saas-metrics-and-analytics/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/chartmogul--saas-metrics-and-analytics-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in SaaS metrics and analytics, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SaaS metrics and analytics standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
AI models' first choice in SaaS metrics and analytics, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/planning/saas-metrics-and-analytics/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/chartmogul--saas-metrics-and-analytics-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in SaaS metrics and analytics, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SaaS metrics and analytics standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.