| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS metrics and analytics | Planning and analysis | 49% | 1 of 78 | 12% | 65 | endorsed leader | ▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 59 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS metrics | 45% | 48% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 45% → 48%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 78, unchanged |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 50 → 59 of 105 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend either ChartMogul for focused revenue metrics or Mixpanel/HubSpot if you want to connect product behavior to ARR” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SaaS metrics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“has been the gold standard for SaaS metrics since 2014 and is the most powerful option for companies with complex billing needs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SaaS metrics · comparative prompt · first choice
“ChartMogul and Databox are the top recommendations due to their ease of use, strong feature sets, and affordability.” Mistral Small · SaaS metrics · direct prompt · first choice
“Final Verdict: For a growing mid-market B2B company, start with ChartMogul to get the subscription metrics right.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SaaS metrics · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid Baremetrics, basic ChartMogul, basic ProfitWell, and Tableau” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative
“criticize it for assuming simple sales processes, leading to poor fits for complex revenue recognition or cohorts” Grok 4.1 Fast · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative
“Metric discrepancies - Users frequently report that ChartMogul's numbers don't always match their billing system” Kimi K2 · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative
“one guide explicitly says ChartMogul can be overkill for that use case and suggests lighter options instead” Perplexity Sonar · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 177 of the 189 answers that named ChartMogul and are not a share of its labels.
567 of the 604 domain citations in answers naming ChartMogul came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 581 | 4 | 2026-08-24 | Revenue recognition | |
| Report or ebook | 51 | 1 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 23 | 0 | 2025-09-16 | ||
| Case study | 18 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2023-06-16 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2024-01-11 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2021-07-02 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2015-07-29 |
Every page chartmogul.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ChartMogul's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: chartmogul.com, chartmogul.com/pricing, chartmogul.com/security, chartmogul.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ChartMogul's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ChartMogul, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ChartMogul by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend ChartMogul first in SaaS metrics and analytics this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.