Databox vs Baremetrics
Two of fourteen models named Databox first on the direct prompt; zero named Baremetrics. Databox was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Baremetrics by fourteen and Databox carries 28 labels and Baremetrics 49, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the saas metrics and analytics page.
By framing
DataboxFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBaremetrics
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Databox and Baremetrics were named in the same answer seventy times, of the 99 answers naming Databox and the 157 naming Baremetrics. In those answers Baremetrics took the first choice thirteen times and Databox four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Databox Baremetrics first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Databox on the left and Baremetrics on the right.The direct prompt
Databox first, Baremetrics an alternative
2 of 14 modelsBaremetrics was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Baremetrics13%#3 of 12Databox2%#4 of 12Databox6%#4 of 14Baremetrics2%#6 of 14Baremetrics2%#7 of 11Databox0%#10 of 11What the models said about Databox
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“the best all-round dashboard is Databox combined with a subscription-revenue backend like ChartMogul” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“the best SaaS metrics dashboard is likely Databox's free plan or Google Looker Studio” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“ChartMogul and Databox are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Baremetrics
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid Baremetrics, basic ChartMogul, basic ProfitWell, and Tableau if you need reliable subscription-revenue metrics.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Criticized for poor customer service, data inconsistencies, and high costs” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“large enterprises should avoid or be cautious about Baremetrics” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Need hosted, set-and-forget revenue reporting with accurate MRR breakdowns: ChartMogul or Baremetrics.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose ChartMogul or Baremetrics if your priority is subscription revenue health” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest looking at Fairview, ChartMogul, or Baremetrics as starting points.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.