AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Planning and analysis › SaaS metrics › Baremetrics vs Amplitude
SaaS metrics and analytics · October 2026 Edition

Baremetrics vs Amplitude

Zero of fourteen models named Baremetrics first on the direct prompt; one named Amplitude. Baremetrics was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Amplitude by thirteen and Baremetrics carries 49 labels and Amplitude 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Baremetrics

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Amplitude

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate22%30%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4927A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Baremetrics reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartMogul was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. ChartMogul vs Baremetrics · ChartMogul vs Amplitude · ProfitWell Metrics vs Baremetrics

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the saas metrics and analytics page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BaremetricsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAmplitude
Direct011 against Baremetrics
Paraphrase001 against Baremetrics
Comparative52
Budget-constrained001 against Baremetrics
Scale-constrained10
Negative108 against Baremetrics · 8 against Amplitude
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Baremetrics and Amplitude were named in the same answer sixty-seven times, of the 157 answers naming Baremetrics and the 81 naming Amplitude. In those answers Amplitude took the first choice five times and Baremetrics twelve.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Baremetrics and Amplitude stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Baremetrics Amplitude first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Baremetrics on the left and Amplitude on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Baremetrics and Amplitude stood in it.

Amplitude first, Baremetrics not the choice

1 of 14 modelsBaremetrics was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Amplitude alternatives: Databox, HubSpot Operations Hub, Mixpanel

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashMaxio Metrics, Subscript alternatives: Amplitude, ChartMogul, Mixpanel, Mosaic
Perplexity SonarChartMogul alternatives: Amplitude, Databox, Maxio Metrics
Grok 4.1 FastChartMogul alternatives: Amplitude, Baremetrics, Databox, Looker Studio, Mixpanel
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartMogul alternatives: Amplitude, Baremetrics, Mixpanel, ProfitWell Metrics
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartMogul alternatives: Baremetrics, Databox
Kimi K2ChartMogul alternatives: Baremetrics, Databox, Klipfolio, Paddle Retain
GLM 4.7 FlashXDatabox alternatives: Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Gainsight
MiniMax M2.5ChartMogul alternatives: Baremetrics, Databox, Maxio Metrics, Microsoft Power BI, ProfitWell Metrics, Tableau
Muse Glimmer 30BChartMogul alternatives: Baremetrics, Paddle, ProfitWell Metrics

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniLooker alternatives: Domo, June, Mixpanel
Mistral SmallChartMogul, Databox alternatives: Tableau, Toolboks
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
GPT-6 LunaChartMogul alternatives: Maxio Metrics

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Baremetrics leads by thirteen points.
Baremetrics13%#3 of 12
Amplitude0%#10 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Baremetrics2%#6 of 14
Amplitude2%#7 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Baremetrics leads by two points.
Baremetrics2%#7 of 11
Amplitude0%#8 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Baremetrics

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid Baremetrics, basic ChartMogul, basic ProfitWell, and Tableau if you need reliable subscription-revenue metrics.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Criticized for poor customer service, data inconsistencies, and high costs” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“large enterprises should avoid or be cautious about Baremetrics” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Need hosted, set-and-forget revenue reporting with accurate MRR breakdowns: ChartMogul or Baremetrics.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose ChartMogul or Baremetrics if your priority is subscription revenue health” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest looking at Fairview, ChartMogul, or Baremetrics as starting points.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Amplitude

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Amplitude is terrible at calculating Net Revenue Retention (NRR), churn reasons, LTV:CAC ratios, or forecasting cash flow accurately” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“it's not recommended for CFO-level financial reporting or accurate calculation of key SaaS metrics” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid using these as your primary SaaS revenue metrics tool.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Amplitude is best for mid-market to enterprise SaaS with dedicated data teams... very strong for B2B SaaS companies, and its cohort analysis is the best.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want to know what users do in the app: start with Amplitude or Mixpanel.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“Need deep product behavior insights with AI? → Amplitude” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.