Cash flow forecasting · October 2026 Edition
Agicap vs Cash Flow Frog
Three of fourteen models named Agicap first on the direct prompt; zero named Cash Flow Frog. Agicap was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Cash Flow Frog by thirteen and Agicap carries 25 labels and Cash Flow Frog 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share13%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2521A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Agicap reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Cube was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Agicap vs Float · Agicap vs Chaser · Agicap vs Tesorio
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cash flow forecasting page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AgicapFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCash Flow Frog
Direct30
Paraphrase40
Comparative01
Budget-constrained04
Scale-constrained001 against Cash Flow Frog
Negative001 against Agicap · 1 against Cash Flow Frog
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Agicap and Cash Flow Frog stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Agicap Cash Flow Frog first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Agicap on the left and Cash Flow Frog on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Agicap and Cash Flow Frog stood in it.
Agicap first, Cash Flow Frog not the choice
3 of 14 modelsCash Flow Frog was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniAgicap alternatives: Datarails, Kyriba, Vena
Perplexity SonarAgicap alternatives: Chaser, Cube, Upflow
Qwen 3.7 FlashAgicap alternatives: Chaser, Cube, Tesorio
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashTesorio alternatives: Agicap, Centime, Cube, Nilus, Trovata
DeepSeek V4 FlashTesorio alternatives: Agicap, Chaser, Float, Vena
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Upflow alternatives: Abacum, Chaser, Cube, Tesorio
Grok 4.1 FastChaser alternatives: Drivetrain, Float, Jirav
Mistral SmallChaser, Cube alternatives: Prophix One, Tesorio
Llama 4 MaverickCube
Kimi K2Chaser alternatives: Abacum, Cube, Fathom, Upflow
GLM 4.7 FlashXCube alternatives: Abacum, HighRadius
MiniMax M2.5Upflow alternatives: Chaser, Drivetrain, Vena
GPT-6 LunaCentime alternatives: Cube, Jirav, Planful, Tesorio
Muse Glimmer 30BTesorio, Upflow alternatives: Abacum, Float, Planful
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Cash Flow Frog leads by thirteen points.
Cash Flow Frog16%#2 of 12Agicap4%#6 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Agicap leads at mid-market.
Agicap13%#1 of 15Cash Flow Frog8%#3 of 15Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Agicap0%#– of 12Cash Flow Frog0%#– of 12What the models said about Agicap
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Agicap has a lack of detailed KPIs tracking, complex initial setup, and is limited to treasury management only” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Agicap is currently widely regarded as a market leader for mid-market finance teams (scoring highest in recent industry analyses for cash flow forecasting)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cash Flow Frog
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“products such as Float, Helm, Dryrun, and Cash Flow Frog are described as good within a narrow scope” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Simpler liquidity focus | 4.6/5 | Fast rolling forecasts | $100-1K/mo (test first)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · soft negative
“For most small-to-mid-sized businesses, Cash Flow Frog offers the best value with deep features at an affordable price” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“with Float and Cash Flow Frog being strong picks for an automated view of your cash position” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Cash Flow Frog stands out as one of the best cash flow forecasting software options” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Agicap vs FloatAgicap vs ChaserAgicap vs TesorioAgicap vs CubeAgicap vs TrovataAgicap vs KyribaFloat vs Cash Flow FrogCash Flow Frog vs ChaserCash Flow Frog vs TesorioCash Flow Frog vs CubeCash Flow Frog vs TrovataCash Flow Frog vs KyribaAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full cash flow forecasting standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.