Small business▼−5Since September 2026: 21% → 16%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 21% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 1 of 109, unchanged
3 categories · RankedAgicap
112Judge labels
29First choices
18Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in Treasury management syst for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 124 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 25 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Agicap →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 117
19%40 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 124
15%25 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise88 of 90
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Agicap for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 15% | 2 of 124 | 20% | 25 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 11% → 15%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 13% | 1 of 101 | 4% | 25 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 18% → 16%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 0% | 31 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Agicap held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Treasury management syst · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 11% → 15%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 2 of 116, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 81 → 79 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management syst | 11% | 15% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 11% → 15%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 124, unchanged |
| Cash flow forecasting | 18% | 16% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 18% → 16%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 101, unchanged |
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 31 of 82, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Agicap across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Agicap across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels12
Paraphrase10 labels5
Comparative25 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels9
Scale-constrained11 labels3
Negative22 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative112 labels in all, every segment counted; 29 of the 39 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Agicap is currently widely regarded as a market leader for mid-market finance teams (scoring highest in recent industry analyses for cash flow forecasting)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · direct prompt · first choice
“Agicap (Top-rated on G2 for small businesses) ... Designed for SMBs to replace spreadsheets without enterprise complexity.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice
“Agicap is the strongest default choice from the results because it is specifically highlighted for small businesses” Perplexity Sonar · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice
“Agicap ⭐ (Best Overall Value) ... offers the best combination of free entry-level access and scalable features” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Agicap: Users report limited customization in reports, missing features for complex financial setups, and difficult/time-consuming setup processes” MiniMax M2.5 · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
“Agicap has a lack of detailed KPIs tracking, complex initial setup, and is limited to treasury management only” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Users find the limited customization in reports and features of Agicap to be a significant drawback.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious if you need deep enterprise capabilities or extensive customization.” GPT-6 Luna · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Agicap, over the 112 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agicap was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Agicap, over the 112 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agicap was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Agicap. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 111 of the 112 answers that named Agicap and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com53
guideflow.com44
agicap.comYour site39
centime.com35
rho.co35
eftsure.com32
eco.com30
checkthat.ai29
us.fitgap.com29
debtbook.com28
315 of the 354 domain citations in answers naming Agicap came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
agicap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Agicap takes 15% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
agicap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Agicap takes 15% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “treasury management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “treasury management systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“agicap”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 31,998 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 9,156 · 175 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,356
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
15%
rank 2 of 124 in treasury management syst
Segment leader
28%
Trovata
- First choices
- 29 across its categories
- Named in
- 112 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 111 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on agicap.com
3,400
subdomains included
Content
613
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
33 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 459 | 9 | 2026-09-23 | Cash flow forecasting, Accounts payable automat | |
| Glossary or explainer | 119 | 0 | 2025-11-26 | Treasury management syst | |
| Report or ebook | 25 | undated | Treasury management syst | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 0 | 2025-11-20 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2025-07-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Iso 20022 migration blog
- 2026-09-11ERP Bank Reconciliation Automation Guide blog
- 2026-09-04Ai cash application software blog
- 2026-08-10Multi banking guide blog
- 2026-07-31Erp bank integration us guide blog
- 2026-07-23Chase overdue invoices blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page agicap.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Agicap
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Agicap; a claim can dispute any of them.
Agicap/Embat 1
Follow Agicap
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Agicap is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Agicap is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the number one cash management solution
- For
- CFO, Finance Team
- Price stated
- Available via custom quote based on business volume. Schedule a demo. agicap.com
- Free plan or trial
- free custom demo; 24-hour free trial agicap.com
- Integrations claimed
- 300 agicap.com
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 27701Pentest certificationISO 27001 : 2022SOC2 type 2 report (In progress)
- Hosting
- Belgian data centers
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, customers
What Agicap's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: agicap.com, trust.agicap.com, agicap.com/en/features, agicap.com/es/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Agicap's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Agicap, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Agicap by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Agicap is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Agicap, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Agicap is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Agicap is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideTreasury management systems
Agicap is among the products AI models recommend first in Treasury management systems this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Cash flow forecasting
AI models recommend Agicap first in Cash flow forecasting this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.