Every category where a model named BitPay for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Stablecoin platforms	Treasury and cash	0%	93 of 141	45%	11	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BitPay yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BitPay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	2	2
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained14 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need to send invoices in crypto that auto-convert at payment, these provide well-tested web interfaces” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · direct prompt · alternative

“For fiat settlement needs: CoinGate or BitPay (1% but reliable fiat conversion)” MiniMax M2.5 · Stablecoin platforms · budget prompt · alternative

“## 5. BitPay – Simple, Institutional‑Style Option” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Stablecoin platforms · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for diversified merchant acceptance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Historically more complex setup; fees are slightly higher for small volumes.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · budget prompt · soft negative

“Other options like BitPay and Coinbase Commerce charge around 1%” Mistral Small · Stablecoin platforms · budget prompt · soft negative

“Lower fees (0.5–1%), but more merchant checkout than deep B2B.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Stablecoin platforms · direct prompt · soft negative

“BitPay is the expensive option for small tickets” Muse Glimmer 30B · Stablecoin platforms · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BitPay, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BitPay was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stripe Crypto17 of 334Not among the top eight

Coinbase Commerce16 of 331Not among the top eight

BVNK12 of 336Not among the top eight

NOWPayments11 of 337Not among the top eight

Circle10 of 332Not among the top eight

CoinGate8 of 331Not among the top eight

BTCPay Server7 of 332Not among the top eight

Eco7 of 331Not among the top eight

Bridge6 of 333Not among the top eight

Coinbase Business6 of 330Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BitPay. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 33 answers that named BitPay and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eco.com25

allscale.io19

linkedin.com12

spark.money11

stripe.com11

cobo.com10

coingape.com10

stablecoininsider.com10

bvnk.com9

f6s.com9

126 of the 126 domain citations in answers naming BitPay came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

eco.com/support/en/articles/14797799-stablecoin-payment-processors-compared-202622

eco.com/support/en/articles/15083177-best-crypto-payment-gateways-202621

allscale.io/posts/best-stablecoin-payment-gateways-crypto-checkout18

cobo.com/post/2026-guide-to-the-most-reliable-stablecoin-payments-providers9

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-cryptocurrency-payment-gateway9

linkedin.com/posts/chiaramunaretto_we-analyzed-the-top-10-stablecoin-payment-activity-73569

opendue.com/blog/best-stablecoin-payment-providers8

pro.edgex.exchange/en-US/news/article/best-stablecoin-payment-platforms-20268

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

bitpay.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, BitPay takes 0% of first choices and BVNK takes 23%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “stablecoin platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “stablecoin payments platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 8,100 a month (“bitpay”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 313 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 27,681 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,455 · 460 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 13,474
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 93 of 141 in stablecoin platforms

Segment leader

23%

BVNK

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 33 answers
Its own site cited: in 30 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on bitpay.com

2,494

subdomains included

Content

1,161

counted in the table below

Documentation

239

Product · Integration

0 · 20

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	1,085	22	2026-09-17
Comparison	29	2	2026-09-03
Glossary or explainer	26	2	2026-08-20
Conference or event	8	0	2014-07-14
Template or tool	6	4	2026-09-17
Report or ebook	3	0	2019-06-10
News or press	2	2	2026-09-17
Case study	1	1	2026-08-04
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-17Savings calculator template or tool
2026-09-17Subscribe blog blog
2026-09-17Boost gift cards terms conditions blog
2026-09-17Dominos boost gift card blog
2026-09-172026 pizza day boost blog
2026-09-17Simplex buy no fees terms conditions blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page bitpay.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow BitPay

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

BitPay is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The all-in-one super app for crypto.
bitpay.com
For: For Individuals; For Businesses
bitpay.com
Price stated: Rates are automatically adjusted based on cumulative monthly volume. < $500,000 USD: 2% + 25¢*; $500,000 - $999,999 USD: 1.5% + 25¢*; ≥ $1,000,000 USD: 1% + 25¢* bitpay.com/pricing
Starting price: 2% + 25¢* bitpay.com/pricing
Certifications: NMLS ID#1496848BitPay is licensed to engage in Virtual Currency Business Activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services.SOC 3SOC 1 Type 2SOC 2 Type 2NYS 23 NYCRR 500 (NY DFS)Digital Operations Resilience Act (DORA)
Hosting: USACanadaIrelandGermany
Not stated on the pages read: Free plan or trial, integrations, customers

What BitPay's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: bitpay.com, bitpay.com/pricing, trust.bitpay.com, bitpay.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BitPay's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BitPay, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BitPay by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where BitPay is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name BitPay, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.