| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stablecoin platforms | Treasury and cash | 9% | 4 of 141 | 7% | 15 | accepted challenger | |
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 20 of 54 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Eco offers multi-rail cross-chain orchestration with 1:1 guaranteed pricing, supporting USDC, USDT, USDG, and PYUSD with sub-minute finality across 15 chains.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Stablecoin platforms · direct prompt · first choice
“The best stablecoin payments platform for a company with a limited budget is likely to be Eco” Llama 4 Maverick · Stablecoin platforms · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation for Most Mid-Market Firms: Eco or Stripe Crypto” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · direct prompt · first choice
“I recommend Eco as the top choice” MiniMax M2.5 · Stablecoin platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“BitPay or Eco: Lower fees (0.5–1%), but more merchant checkout than deep B2B.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Stablecoin platforms · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 45 answers that named Eco and are not a share of its labels.
123 of the 168 domain citations in answers naming Eco came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | 154 | 100 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Blog | 44 | 6 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-17 |
Every page eco.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Eco's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: eco.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Eco's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Eco, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Eco by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: