Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 → 4 of 77
1 category · RankedChargebee RevRec
65Judge labels
5First choices
12Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Revenue recognition for small business buyers
Rank 11 of 77 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 13% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Chargebee RevRec →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 79
7%32 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market11 of 77
2%23 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise60 of 65
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
In revenue recognition · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Chargebee RevRec for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 2% | 11 of 77 | 13% | 23 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Chargebee RevRec held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Revenue recognition · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 21 → 10 of 74
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 55 → 58 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 11 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Chargebee RevRec across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Chargebee RevRec across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels1
Paraphrase10 labels3
Comparative19 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative65 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend Maxio ... or Chargebee Revenue Recognition (RevRec) as strong ASC 606 compliance tools” Grok 4.1 Fast · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Maxio or Chargebee RevRec if you're a SaaS company that wants billing + rev rec together.” GPT-5.4 mini · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · alternative
“Chargebee is a dominant player in the subscription billing space and offers a robust RevRec module” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue recognition · direct prompt · alternative
“Purpose-built for recurring revenue models, integrates billing and recognition in one platform” Kimi K2 · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Chargebee RevRec can inherit billing setup issues if your billing configuration is messy.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · soft negative
“G2 lists its starting price at $5,000, which is usually too high for a tight budget” GPT-5.4 mini · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · soft negative
“Convenient if already in the Chargebee ecosystem, but limited for complex arrangements” Kimi K2 · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chargebee RevRec, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chargebee RevRec was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chargebee RevRec, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chargebee RevRec was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chargebee RevRec. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 65 answers that named Chargebee RevRec and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
wise.com37
ledgerup.ai36
guideflow.com30
pipedrive.com27
zenskar.com27
hubifi.com26
rightrev.com24
dualentry.com23
fueler.io21
synder.com21
272 of the 272 domain citations in answers naming Chargebee RevRec came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
chargebee.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Chargebee RevRec takes 2% of first choices and Maxio takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
chargebee.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Chargebee RevRec takes 2% of first choices and Maxio takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “revenue recognition tools”
1
Position for “revenue recognition software”
7
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“chargebee revrec”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 69,891 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,794 · 790 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,873
- Paid Google search
- 7 searches its ads show for, about 78 clicks and $1,889 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 77 in revenue recognition
Segment leader
20%
Maxio
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 65 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 62 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on chargebee.com
1,548
subdomains included
Content
1,070
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
32 · 35
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 677 | 10 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Case study | 101 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 91 | 0 | 2025-10-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 77 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 49 | 0 | 2021-04-29 | ||
| Comparison | 30 | 0 | 2025-10-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 23 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 15 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Subscription cancellation dark patterns 5 steps to help audit your cancel flow blog
- 2026-09-10What works in go to market the new revenue playbook blog
- 2026-08-31How to monetize ai features faster blog
- 2026-08-25How to price ai products framework for choosing the right model blog
- 2026-08-13Chargebee named a leader in the 2026 gartner magic quadrant for recurring billing applications blog
- 2026-08-12Subscription business model blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 6, 2026Beelieve roadshow BerlinBerlin · hosts
- October 14, 2026Beelieve roadshow ParisParis · hosts
Last twelve months
- September 22, 2026Beelieve New YorkNew York City · hosted
- September 15, 2026Beelieve roadshow SydneySydney · hosted
- June 4, 2026Beelieve '26 LondonTobacco Dock, London · hosted
- April 15, 2026 to April 16, 2026Beelieve '26 San FranciscoFort Mason, San Francisco · hosted
As the event pages on chargebee.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page chargebee.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Chargebee RevRec
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Chargebee RevRec; a claim can dispute any of them.
Chargebee 5Chargebee RevRec (formerly RevLock) 2Chargebee Revenue Recognition (RevRec) 2
Follow Chargebee RevRec
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Chargebee RevRec is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Chargebee RevRec is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Recognize revenue across contracts and usage models
- For
- For finance teams looking for out-of-the-box revenue recognition automation.
- Price stated
- Book a demo and request pricing chargebee.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial chargebee.com/security
- Certifications
- ASC 606IFRS 15PCI DSS Level 1ISO 27001:2022SOC 1 Type IISOC 2 Type IIEU-U.S. Data Privacy FrameworkUK Extension to the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework
- Customers named
- Drake SoftwareCodacy
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Chargebee RevRec's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: chargebee.com, chargebee.com/pricing, chargebee.com/security, chargebee.com/features, chargebee.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chargebee RevRec's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chargebee RevRec, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Chargebee RevRec by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Chargebee RevRec is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Chargebee RevRec, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.