Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 73 → 74 of 77
SAP Revenue Accounting · 1 category · RankedSAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting
53Judge labels
2First choices
13Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Revenue recognition for enterprise buyers
Rank 23 of 77 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business76 of 79
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 77
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise3 of 65
4%42 labels
accepted challenger
In revenue recognition · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 23 of 77 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Revenue recognition · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 31 → 22 of 74
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 of 62, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 23 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels1
Paraphrase9 labels1
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative11 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative53 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Global enterprises on SAP ... Steep learning curve; tied to SAP infra.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · alternative
“SAP RAR (best for global enterprises on existing SAP infrastructure)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · alternative
“SAP Revenue Management is a strong alternative” GPT-5.4 mini · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 53 answers that named SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
rightrev.com35
wise.com33
zuora.com29
guideflow.com28
ledgerup.ai26
zenskar.com26
younium.com24
dualentry.com23
fueler.io21
synder.com20
265 of the 265 domain citations in answers naming SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting takes 0% of first choices and Maxio takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting takes 0% of first choices and Maxio takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “revenue recognition tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “revenue recognition software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“sap revenue accounting and reporting”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- sap.com shared with SAP Revenue Accounting's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,214,514 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 117,113 · 18,594 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 113,777
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 68 clicks and $1,251 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 77 in revenue recognition
Segment leader
20%
Maxio
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 53 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 52 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP RAR 2SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting (RAR) 2SAP Revenue Management 1
Follow SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.