Every category where a model named Chargeblast for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Chargeback management	Receivables and billing	6%	6 of 81	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Chargeblast yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Chargeblast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels8

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ChargeBlast is the strongest fit for mid-market dispute teams that need deadline-driven representment workflows” Muse Glimmer 30B · Chargeback management · direct prompt · first choice

“Start with Chargeblast or Chargeflow for mid-market companies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Chargeback management · direct prompt · first choice

“my top recommendation is ChargeBlast” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Chargeback management · direct prompt · first choice

“Start with pay-per-alert services like Chargeback.com ($35/alert) or Chargeblast ($0.05/order)” MiniMax M2.5 · Chargeback management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Chargeblast, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chargeblast was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Chargeflow36 of 4413Compare →

Chargebacks91120 of 442Compare →

Justt17 of 442Compare →

Disputifier17 of 441Compare →

Midigator10 of 442Compare →

Signifyd9 of 440Not among the top eight

ChargebackStop7 of 440Not among the top eight

Ethoca7 of 440Not among the top eight

Kount7 of 440Not among the top eight

Verifi7 of 440Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chargeblast. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 44 answers that named Chargeblast and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

chargeflow.io31

chargeback.io29

guideflow.com25

getapp.com23

softwareadvice.com20

g2.com19

beastinsights.com18

chargeblast.comYour site16

shopiator.com15

fintechspecs.com14

194 of the 210 domain citations in answers naming Chargeblast came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/chargeback-management-software25

chargeback.io/blog/best-chargeback-prevention-software24

getapp.com/all-software/chargeback-management23

softwareadvice.com/category/4793-chargeback-management19

beastinsights.com/best/chargeback-management-software18

chargeflow.io/chargebacks-101/chargeback-solutions17

shopiator.com/blog/best-chargeback-prevention-software15

fintechspecs.com/blog/best-chargeback-management-tools-saas14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

chargeblast.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Chargeblast takes 6% of first choices and Chargeflow takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “chargeback management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “chargeback management tools”

Searches for its name, Google: 1,000 a month (“chargeblast”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 12 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 19,270 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 5,746 · 338 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,588
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

60 ads · 40 text, 16 image, 4 video · 11 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2024, as Seaport Software LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 36 in the year, 24 before. 2 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 81 in chargeback management

Segment leader

24%

Chargeflow

First choices: 11 across its categories
Named in: 44 answers
Its own site cited: in 44 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on chargeblast.com

1,382

subdomains included

Content

1,154

counted in the table below

Documentation

182

Product · Integration

0 · 18

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	893	24	2026-10-02	Chargeback management, Payment orchestration
Comparison	141	4	2026-09-30	Chargeback management
Glossary or explainer	99	3	2026-08-21
Case study	9	0	2025-06-03
Template or tool	9	0	2026-04-06
Report or ebook	3	undated

Most recent

2026-10-02Stripe chargeback recovery blog
2026-10-02Paypal braintree chargeback recovery blog
2026-09-30Arn vs bin caid comparison
2026-09-26Subscription chargeback recovery blog
2026-09-14Digital goods chargeback recovery blog
2026-09-12Shopify chargeback recovery blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page chargeblast.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Chargeblast

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Chargeblast; a claim can dispute any of them.

ChargeBlast 3

Follow Chargeblast

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Chargeblast is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Chargeback Prevention Software
chargeblast.com
For: ecommerce merchants
chargeblast.com
Price stated: Only pay for successfully won disputes. chargeblast.com
Starting price: 14 chargeblast.com/pricing
Integrations claimed: 45 chargeblast.com · 35 chargeblast.com/pricing pages disagree
Certifications: PCI QI CompliantVerified Stripe PartnerShopify PartnerOfficial Stripe Partner
Not stated on the pages read: Free plan or trial, hosting, customers

What Chargeblast's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: chargeblast.com, chargeblast.com/pricing, chargeblast.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chargeblast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chargeblast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Chargeblast by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Chargeblast is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Chargeblast, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.