AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Circle Mint · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Circle Mint

5Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Circle Mint was named 1 time in Stablecoin platforms, where BVNK led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market47 of 141
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise10 of 111
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
In stablecoin platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Circle Mint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Stablecoin platformsTreasury and cash0%47 of 1410%1under 10 labels · led by BVNK at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Circle Mint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Circle Mint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Circle Mint is a close second” Mistral Small · Stablecoin platforms · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Circle Mint, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Circle Mint was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BVNK5 of 52Not among the top eight
Stripe Crypto4 of 51Not among the top eight
Bridge3 of 52Not among the top eight
Fireblocks2 of 50Not among the top eight
Circle Payments Network1 of 50Not among the top eight
Coinbase Commerce / Coinbase Business1 of 50Not among the top eight
Mastercard1 of 50Not among the top eight
Paxos1 of 50Not among the top eight
Request Finance1 of 50Not among the top eight
Ripple Payments1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Circle Mint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Circle Mint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bvnk.com3
fireblocks.com3
allscale.io2
cobo.com2
coingape.com2
eco.com2
opendue.com2
paxos.com2
ripple.com2
stripe.com2

Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Circle Mint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

allscale.io/posts/best-stablecoin-payment-gateways-crypto-checkout2
eco.com/support/en/articles/14797799-stablecoin-payment-processors-compared-20262
opendue.com/blog/best-stablecoin-payment-providers2
ripple.com/products/cross-border-payments2
bitcoinfoundation.org/news/features/crypto-payment1
bvnk.com/1
bvnk.com/blog/best-crypto-payment-gateway1
bvnk.com/letsgo1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

circle.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Circle Mint takes 0% of first choices and BVNK takes 23%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “stablecoin platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “stablecoin payments platform”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 78,492 a month
Searches its site ranks for
8,705 · 515 in the top three
Sites linking to it
17,534
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
67 ads · 32 video, 18 text, 17 image · 8 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2024, as Circle Internet Financial, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 58 in the year, 9 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 47 of 141 in stablecoin platforms
Segment leader
23%
BVNK
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on circle.com
8,932
subdomains included
Content
1,068
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,004
Product · Integration
7 · 2,286
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog815142026-09-21
News or press168152026-09-28
Report or ebook2802026-01-13
Case study2592026-09-02
Conference or event1102025-12-16
Webinar or virtual event1002024-01-16
Comparison612026-09-15
Glossary or explainer4undated
Podcast or video102021-01-07

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page circle.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Circle Mint

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Circle Mint; a claim can dispute any of them.
Circle Mint (USDC) 1

Follow Circle Mint

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Circle Mint is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Mint, redeem, reserve, and manage USDC, EURC, and cirBTC at global scale.
circle.com
For
institutions
circle.com
Customers named
Mt PelerinCodexaJanuar
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Circle Mint's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: circle.com, circle.com/use-case/fx, circle.com/case-studies, circle.com/topic/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Circle Mint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Circle Mint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Circle Mint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Circle Mint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Circle Mint, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at circle.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.