Every category where a model named Fireblocks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Stablecoin platforms	Treasury and cash	2%	12 of 141	7%	15	accepted challenger
Crypto accounting	Accounting and close	0%	22 of 54	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Bitwave at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fireblocks yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fireblocks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	1	0	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase28 labels4

Comparative19 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained11 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Circle (USDC) and Fireblocks are both excellent choices” Mistral Small · Stablecoin platforms · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best if your priority is institutional-grade custody, MPC wallets, and tokenization for your treasury team.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“if your top concern is institutional custody, security, and transfer controls” Perplexity Sonar · Stablecoin platforms · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Custody + instant settlement. | Treasury/high-volume. | Complex setup.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Stablecoin platforms · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“more custody-heavy; overkill unless you need MPC wallets/multi-party security” Grok 4.1 Fast · Stablecoin platforms · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fireblocks, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fireblocks was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Circle50 of 6820Compare →

BVNK41 of 6816Compare →

Bridge34 of 685Compare →

Stripe Crypto25 of 682Compare →

Paxos25 of 681Not among the top eight

Eco13 of 682Compare →

Crossmint12 of 681Not among the top eight

Cobo9 of 680Not among the top eight

Ripple9 of 680Not among the top eight

Coinbase Business8 of 681Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fireblocks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 68 answers that named Fireblocks and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eco.com40

fireblocks.comYour site32

walletinvestor.com32

coingape.com30

stablecoininsider.org27

crossmint.com22

circle.com21

cobo.com20

bvnk.com18

opendue.com18

228 of the 260 domain citations in answers naming Fireblocks came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coingape.com/best-stablecoin-infrastructure-provider-companies28

eco.com/support/en/articles/15232571-best-stablecoin-infrastructure-providers-for-b2b-plat20

cobo.com/post/2026-guide-to-the-most-reliable-stablecoin-payments-providers18

eco.com/support/en/articles/15261552-top-stablecoin-payment-rails-for-enterprises-202617

fireblocks.com/report/compare-enterprise-stablecoin-payments17

opendue.com/blog/best-stablecoin-payment-providers17

walletinvestor.com/news/finance-news/best-enterprise-stablecoin-issuance-platforms-for-cro16

walletinvestor.com/news/finance-news/best-stablecoin-infrastructure-platforms16

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

fireblocks.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fireblocks takes 2% of first choices and BVNK takes 23%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “stablecoin platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “stablecoin payments platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 5,400 a month (“fireblocks”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 556 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 9,317 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,217 · 160 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 7,950
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

56 ads · 53 text, 2 video, 1 image · 18 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2024, as Fireblocks Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 34 in the year, 22 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 12 of 141 in stablecoin platforms

Segment leader

23%

BVNK

First choices: 7 across its categories
Named in: 68 answers
Its own site cited: in 63 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on fireblocks.com

2,571

subdomains included

Content

919

counted in the table below

Documentation

1,462

Product · Integration

35 · 3

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	500	14	2026-09-28
News or press	176	0	2023-11-28
Case study	74	4	2026-09-28
Report or ebook	71	23	2026-09-28
Glossary or explainer	49	0	2026-06-29
Webinar or virtual event	21	0	2025-03-07
Conference or event	13	2	2026-09-14
Comparison	12	0	2025-08-25
Template or tool	2	0	2021-05-25
Podcast or video	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-28Shipovnik signature forgery discovered blog
2026-09-28Financial grid corporates report or ebook
2026-09-28Bitvavo case study
2026-09-25Tokenized collateral is live in production blog
2026-09-24Citadel dtcc tokenization blog
2026-09-24Buyers guide fintechs report or ebook

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page fireblocks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Fireblocks

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fireblocks; a claim can dispute any of them.

Fireblocks/Ripple 1TRES/Fireblocks 1

Follow Fireblocks

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Fireblocks is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: enterprise grade digital asset and stablecoin infrastructure that powers financial possibility for organizations of all sizes
fireblocks.com
For: organizations of all sizes
fireblocks.com
Price stated: Essentials: $999 per month, up to 6 months. Custom: Starting at $36,000 per year. fireblocks.com/pricing
Starting price: 999 fireblocks.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: The Developer Sandbox is the quickest way to evaluate Fireblocks and begin testing your application with our APIs, SDKs, and Console. fireblocks.com/pricing
Integrations claimed: 30 fireblocks.com/pricing
Certifications: ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO/IEC 27017:2015ISO/IEC 27018:2019SOC 2 Type 2SOC 1 Type 2Crypto Currency Security Standard
Customers named: MoneyGramQCPABN AMRORevolutBridgeGSRSentoraGalaxy
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What Fireblocks's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: fireblocks.com, fireblocks.com/pricing, trust.fireblocks.com, fireblocks.com/products/earn, fireblocks.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fireblocks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fireblocks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fireblocks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Fireblocks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fireblocks, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.