AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › ComplyAdvantage · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

ComplyAdvantage

134Judge labels
33First choices
15Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
33% in AML monitoring for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 108 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 48 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ComplyAdvantage →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In aml monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ComplyAdvantage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AML and transaction monitoringTax and compliance33%1 of 1086%48endorsed leader

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ComplyAdvantage yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ComplyAdvantage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512104
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash12115
Perplexity Sonar11013
Grok 4.1 Fast11305
Mistral Small12014
DeepSeek V4 Flash22004
Llama 4 Maverick10203
Qwen 3.7 Flash21003
Kimi K230205
GLM 4.7 FlashX21104
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna12003
Muse Glimmer 30B12104

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct27 labels14
Paraphrase21 labels6
Comparative28 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained26 labels12
Scale-constrained16 labels1
Negative16 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative134 labels in all, every segment counted; 33 of the 38 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I recommend starting with NorthRow or ComplyAdvantage as they offer the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of implementation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AML monitoring · direct prompt · first choice
“ComplyAdvantage is currently the best balance of affordability, transparency, and comprehensive features, starting at just $99/month” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AML monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
“ComplyAdvantage and Vespia are excellent choices if you need advanced automation, global coverage, and scalability.” Mistral Small · AML monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start with ComplyAdvantage if you want an affordable, proven solution with transparent pricing and strong AI capabilities” Kimi K2 · AML monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Entry-level SaaS pricing cited around $99/month for basic screening, though it is not specifically framed as the cheapest end-to-end option.” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · budget prompt · soft negative
“excellent for fintechs, neobanks, and web3 companies... However, they are highly sensitive to data quality.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AML monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“their suitability depends on your business model, transaction volume, and regulatory requirements” Mistral Small · AML monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ComplyAdvantage, over the 134 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ComplyAdvantage was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
NICE Actimize66 of 13417Not among the top eight
Sumsub33 of 1342Not among the top eight
Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management27 of 1342Not among the top eight
Sardine27 of 1340Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ComplyAdvantage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 130 of the 134 answers that named ComplyAdvantage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fraud.net62
ondato.com60
sphinxhq.com51
bureau.id48
complyadvantage.comYour site47
g2.com47
guideflow.com45
fraudio.com43
amlwatcher.com39
learn.g2.com37

432 of the 479 domain citations in answers naming ComplyAdvantage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where ComplyAdvantage stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“complyadvantage”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
11 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 30,377 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,516 · 303 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,903
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
38 ads · 38 text · 16 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as IVXS TECHNOLOGY USA INC., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 9 in the year, 29 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
33%
rank 1 of 108 in AML monitoring
First choices
33
across its categories
Named in
134 answers
Its own site cited
in 130 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on complyadvantage.com
1,785
subdomains included
Content
855
counted in the table below
Documentation
238
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog626202026-09-21
News or press7722026-08-26
Case study4402026-06-29
Glossary or explainer4002025-04-28
Webinar or virtual event3602023-02-06
Report or ebook1502025-12-11
Comparison702026-02-11
Template or tool702022-09-23
Conference or event202024-06-11
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page complyadvantage.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as ComplyAdvantage

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ComplyAdvantage; a claim can dispute any of them.
ComplyAdvantage Starter 2ComplyAdvantage (Mesh) 1

Follow ComplyAdvantage

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ComplyAdvantage is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The leader in AI-driven AML risk detection
For
compliance leaders and practitioners
Price stated
From $99 per month for 100 250 500 750 1,000 1,500 2,000 monitored entities complyadvantage.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
ComplyLaunch, our program for early-stage start-ups, gives you free access to enterprise-grade AML solutions. complyadvantage.com/pricing
Customers named
MonexRecapInpayMama MoneyHitPayGlobus PaymentsHolviTala
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What ComplyAdvantage's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: complyadvantage.com, complyadvantage.com/pricing, complyadvantage.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ComplyAdvantage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ComplyAdvantage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ComplyAdvantage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ComplyAdvantage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ComplyAdvantage, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at complyadvantage.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where ComplyAdvantage is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

AI models recommend ComplyAdvantage first in AML and transaction monitoring this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
AI models' first choice in AML and transaction monitoring, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/tax/aml-and-transaction-monitoring/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/complyadvantage--aml-and-transaction-monitoring-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in AML and transaction monitoring, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AML and transaction monitoring standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
AI models' first choice in AML and transaction monitoring, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/tax/aml-and-transaction-monitoring/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/complyadvantage--aml-and-transaction-monitoring-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in AML and transaction monitoring, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AML and transaction monitoring standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
AI models' first choice in AML and transaction monitoring, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/tax/aml-and-transaction-monitoring/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/complyadvantage--aml-and-transaction-monitoring-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in AML and transaction monitoring, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AML and transaction monitoring standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.