AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Diligent · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Diligent

5Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Diligent was named 2 times in Disclosure reporting and 1 other category, where Workiva led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In disclosure reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Diligent for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SEC and disclosure reportingAccounting and close0%27 of 630%1under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32%
Virtual data roomsEquity and corporate0%41 of 48100%1under 10 labels · led by iDeals at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Diligent yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Diligent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Governance/board-oriented disclosure workflow: Diligent” GPT-5.4 mini · Disclosure reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“significantly cheaper than competitors like IntraLinks or Diligent” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Virtual data rooms · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Diligent, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diligent was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Intralinks3 of 50Not among the top eight
Box2 of 50Not among the top eight
Datasite Diligence2 of 50Not among the top eight
FirmRoom2 of 50Not among the top eight
DocSend1 of 51Not among the top eight
DocuPass1 of 51Not among the top eight
EDGAR1 of 51Not among the top eight
Firmex1 of 51Not among the top eight
SecureDocs1 of 51Not among the top eight
Workiva1 of 51Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Diligent. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 5 answers that named Diligent and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

caplinked.com1
clinked.com1
dataroom-providers.org1
ellty.com1
fast.io1
intralinks.com1
mnacommunity.com1
onit.com1
papermark.com1
peony.ink1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Diligent came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

diligent.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Diligent takes 0% of first choices and Workiva takes 32%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sec and disclosure reporting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sec and disclosure reporting platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
165,000 a month (“diligent”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
6,449 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 317,551 a month
Searches its site ranks for
19,994 · 2,292 in the top three
Sites linking to it
8,276
Paid Google search
3 searches its ads show for, about 21 clicks and $287 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 117 text, 3 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2024, as DILIGENT BOARD MEMBER SERVICES, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 35 in the year, 85 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 63 in disclosure reporting
Segment leader
32%
Workiva
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on diligent.com
5,103
subdomains included
Content
3,148
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,137
Product · Integration
142 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,600undated
Report or ebook478undated
Podcast or video397undated
News or press312undated
Webinar or virtual event139undated
Case study105undated
Glossary or explainer52undated
Conference or event26undated
Comparison26undated
Template or tool13undated

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on diligent.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page diligent.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Diligent

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Diligent is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The leading AI platform for GRC
For
boards and leaders; directors, executives or GRC practitioners
Price stated
Request Pricing diligent.com
Certifications
Leader, Forrester Wave™ GRC Platforms, 2026Leader, Magic Quadrant™ GRC Platforms 2026SOC 2SOC 1ISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27001 SoAISO/IEC 27017:2015ISO/IEC 27018:2019
Customers named
BarclaysAssore HoldingsELCO MutualTeachers Mutual Bank LimitedDWFFountain-Fort Carson School DistrictTown of CarbondaleVictaulic
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Diligent's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: diligent.com, diligent.com/pricing, trust.diligent.com, diligent.com/products/boards, diligent.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Diligent's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Diligent, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Diligent by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Diligent is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Diligent, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at diligent.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.