Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 112 → 104 of 109
1 category · RankedFIS Quantum
28Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Treasury management syst for mid-market buyers
Rank 33 of 124 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of FIS Quantum →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business112 of 117
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market33 of 124
0%12 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise22 of 90
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named FIS Quantum for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 33 of 124 | 25% | 12 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, FIS Quantum held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Treasury management syst · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 100 → 30 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 16 → 21 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 100 → 33 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated FIS Quantum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated FIS Quantum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Kyriba and FIS Quantum are widely regarded as leaders in the TMS space.” Mistral Small · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · first choice
“Complex financial risk, instruments, or enterprise treasury: include FIS Quantum” GPT-6 Luna · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
“Strengths: SQL-configurable custom reporting, high-volume global enterprises.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
“Largest global enterprise with complex derivatives? → FIS Quantum” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Legacy enterprise systems (like FIS Quantum or fully custom SAP Treasury modules) are often too expensive, require dedicated IT teams, and take 6 to 12 months to implement.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · soft negative
“Older enterprise systems (such as older or privately hosted versions of *FIS Quantum*) ... Expensive Upgrade Cycles ... Poor API Integration” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise TMS such as Kyriba, GTreasury, ION, FIS Quantum and SAP Treasury” Muse Glimmer 30B · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FIS Quantum, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FIS Quantum was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FIS Quantum, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FIS Quantum was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FIS Quantum. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 28 answers that named FIS Quantum and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
eco.com22
rho.co14
checkthat.ai13
finantrix.com13
guideflow.com13
debtbook.com11
treasury.ripple.com11
eftsure.com9
fisglobal.comYour site7
gartner.com7
113 of the 120 domain citations in answers naming FIS Quantum came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
fisglobal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, FIS Quantum takes 0% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
fisglobal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, FIS Quantum takes 0% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “treasury management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “treasury management systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“fis quantum”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 23 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 175,497 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 9,053 · 990 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 11,973
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 33 of 124 in treasury management syst
Segment leader
28%
Trovata
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 28 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 27 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on fisglobal.com
1,871
subdomains included
Content
732
counted in the table below
Documentation
11
Product · Integration
184 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 304 | undated | |||
| Blog | 303 | 0 | 2026-06-03 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 48 | 0 | 2026-05-26 | ||
| Conference or event | 34 | 3 | 2026-10-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 29 | 0 | 2024-07-08 | ||
| Podcast or video | 12 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-01UW Milwaukee Business Communications Internship Career Fair conference or event
- 2026-09-30UNF Business Career Fair conference or event
- 2026-09-30FAMU Career and Internship Expo conference or event
- 2026-06-03United business bank blog
- 2026-05-26Scaling total portfolio management agentic ai webinar or virtual event
- 2026-05-15Private markets growth scaling for investor success blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 8, 2026Goldman Sachs Communicopia + Technology conferenceSan Francisco · spoke
- May 19, 2026J.P. Morgan 54th Annual Global Technology, Media and Communications Conferenceplace not stated · spoke
As the event pages on fisglobal.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page fisglobal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as FIS Quantum
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FIS Quantum; a claim can dispute any of them.
FIS Quantum (Treasury and Risk Manager) 1FIS Treasury and Risk Manager – Integrity Edition / FIS Quantum 1
Follow FIS Quantum
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FIS Quantum's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FIS Quantum, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FIS Quantum by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where FIS Quantum is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name FIS Quantum, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.