Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 74 → 92 of 100
3 categories · RankedKyriba
259Judge labels
47First choices
98Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
35% in Treasury management syst for enterprise buyers
Rank 10 of 101 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 27% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Kyriba →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business102 of 107
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 101
4%22 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 107
24%45 labels
accepted challenger
In cash flow forecasting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Kyriba for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 4% | 10 of 101 | 27% | 22 | criticized challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 4% | 5 of 124 | 43% | 53 | criticized challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cross-border payments and FX | Treasury and cash | 0% | 60 of 87 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 39% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Kyriba held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Cash flow forecasting · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 13 → 8 of 96
Enterprise▼−13Since September 2026: 35% → 22%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 35% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 3 pointsRank 1 of 97, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management syst | 9% | 4% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 5 of 124 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 2% | 5% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 10 of 101 |
| Cross-border payments | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 60 of 87 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Kyriba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Kyriba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct50 labels14
Paraphrase40 labels25
Comparative67 labels33not counted in share
Budget-constrained35 labels6
Scale-constrained28 labels2
Negative39 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative259 labels in all, every segment counted; 47 of the 85 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best all-around treasury platform for real-time cash visibility, payments control and liquidity management at scale.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Kyriba if you want the most emphasis on real-time liquidity, payments, connectivity, and analytics.” GPT-5.4 mini · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · first choice
“Kyriba is widely regarded as one of the leading treasury management systems for large, global organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · first choice
“I recommend Kyriba for a mid-sized B2B company looking for comprehensive cash management solutions.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cash flow forecasting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“traditional enterprise Treasury Management Systems (TMS) like Kyriba, FIS Integrity, or ION Treasury are generally out of reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-heavy tools like Kyriba if implementation complexity and cost are major concerns.” Perplexity Sonar · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise solutions like Kyriba, SAP, or GTreasury if you're on a limited budget” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise options like Kyriba or GTreasury unless you have over $50M in revenue” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Kyriba, over the 259 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kyriba was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Kyriba, over the 259 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kyriba was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kyriba. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 244 of the 259 answers that named Kyriba and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
eco.com99
debtbook.com86
g2.com80
guideflow.com75
treasury.ripple.com72
rho.co71
checkthat.ai70
highradius.com67
gartner.com63
eftsure.com55
738 of the 738 domain citations in answers naming Kyriba came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
kyriba.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Kyriba takes 4% of first choices and Agicap takes 13%.ShowHide
Search and answers
kyriba.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Kyriba takes 4% of first choices and Agicap takes 13%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cash forecasting tools”
5
Position for “cash flow forecasting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 4,400 a month (“kyriba”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 155 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 38,514 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,103 · 240 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,176
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 10 of 101 in cash flow forecasting
Segment leader
13%
Agicap
- First choices
- 47 across its categories
- Named in
- 259 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 244 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on kyriba.com
1,284
subdomains included
Content
1,058
counted in the table below
Documentation
54
Product · Integration
40 · 10
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 460 | undated | Treasury management syst, Cash flow forecasting | ||
| News or press | 206 | undated | Treasury management syst | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 194 | undated | Treasury management syst | ||
| Case study | 118 | undated | Treasury management syst | ||
| Podcast or video | 46 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | undated | Treasury management syst | ||
| Conference or event | 10 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 6 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page kyriba.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Kyriba
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Kyriba; a claim can dispute any of them.
Kyriba Enterprise 1
Follow Kyriba
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Kyriba is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Kyriba is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Proven solutions to elevate liquidity performance
- For
- finance leaders
- Integrations claimed
- 10000 kyriba.com
- Customers named
- HCSC
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting
What Kyriba's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: kyriba.com, trust.kyriba.com, kyriba.com/products, kyriba.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kyriba's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kyriba, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kyriba by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Kyriba is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kyriba, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.