Every category where a model named Flintfox for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Rebate management	Receivables and billing	2%	5 of 80	12%	24	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Flintfox yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Flintfox across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	2	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	0	3
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	1	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Recognized as a global leader in trade revenue management... particularly well-suited for mid-size businesses with complex rebate structures” Mistral Small · Rebate management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Flintfox excels in managing retrospective discounts, tiered incentives, and performance-based rebates with precision and transparency” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Rebate management · direct prompt · alternative

“if you have particularly complex pricing structures or multi-channel requirements, Flintfox would be the stronger choice” MiniMax M2.5 · Rebate management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Choose Flintfox if pricing complexity is a major part of the problem, not just rebate settlement.” GPT-5.4 mini · Rebate management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Flintfox | Enterprise-focused with custom pricing” Kimi K2 · Rebate management · budget prompt · hard negative

“Having multiple non-standard documents will affect how your organisation passes rebates onto customers and is likely to cause issues down the line” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Rebate management · negative prompt · soft negative

“Flintfox by Enable — ask for recent, comparable customer references.” GPT-6 Luna · Rebate management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Flintfox, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Flintfox was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Enable36 of 4219Compare →

Vistex29 of 421Not among the top eight

Vendavo18 of 420Not among the top eight

Model N14 of 421Not among the top eight

Pricefx13 of 420Not among the top eight

Voucherify8 of 424Compare →

IMA3608 of 420Not among the top eight

e-bate7 of 422Compare →

incentX7 of 421Compare →

Salesforce Revenue Cloud6 of 420Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Flintfox. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 42 answers that named Flintfox and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com35

guideflow.com26

level6.com24

theretailexec.com23

worldmetrics.org22

enable.com21

oncentive.io19

sourceforge.net19

us.fitgap.com19

zipdo.co19

227 of the 227 domain citations in answers naming Flintfox came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/rebate-management34

guideflow.com/blog/rebate-management-software25

level6.com/blog/best-rebate-management-tools24

theretailexec.com/tools/best-rebate-management-software23

oncentive.io/blog/best-rebate-management-software19

sourceforge.net/software/rebate-management14

worldmetrics.org/best/rebate-software13

f6s.com/software/category/rebate-management12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

flintfox.ca is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Flintfox takes 2% of first choices and Enable takes 52%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “rebate management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “rebate management platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“flintfox”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 2 a month
Organic visits to its site: about a month
Searches its site ranks for: · in the top three
Sites linking to it: 29
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 80 in rebate management

Segment leader

52%

Enable

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 42 answers
Its own site cited: in 41 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on flintfox.ca

466

subdomains included

Content

391

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

9 · 1

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	239	0	2026-07-06	Rebate management, Revenue recognition
Case study	64	1	2026-07-15	Rebate management
Webinar or virtual event	20	0	2024-08-08	Rebate management
Comparison	14	0	2026-06-26
Glossary or explainer	14	0	2026-04-16	Rebate management
Report or ebook	12	undated		Rebate management
News or press	12	1	2026-09-17
Conference or event	11	0	2026-04-07
Template or tool	5	1	2026-07-22

Most recent

2026-09-17Flintfox by enable achieves sap certified for clean core with rise with sap news or press
2026-07-22Margin calculator template template or tool
2026-07-15Powering up profitability how enable transformed gamestops vendor funding case study
2026-07-06Forrester total economic impact 2026 blog
2026-06-26The definitive expert comparison of b2b pricing optimization tools vs erp modules comparison
2026-06-15Rebate vs pricing optimization comparison

Events in person

Upcoming

October 15, 2026The Commercial Strategy Forum: Pricing, Rebates & Margin GrowthF1 Arcade London, London · hosts

As the event pages on flintfox.ca state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page flintfox.ca exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Flintfox

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Flintfox; a claim can dispute any of them.

Flintfox by Enable 3

Follow Flintfox

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Flintfox is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Flintfox by Enable Intelligent Pricing Platform
flintfox.ca
Customers named: The Very GroupWesco
Not stated on the pages read: Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Flintfox's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: flintfox.ca. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Flintfox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Flintfox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Flintfox by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Flintfox is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Flintfox, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.