Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 38 → 149 of 158
1 category · RankedHireEZ
21Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Strategic sourcing for mid-market buyers
Rank 18 of 128 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of HireEZ →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business143 of 166
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 128
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise15 of 77
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HireEZ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 18 of 128 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HireEZ held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Strategic sourcing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 32 → 18 of 120
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 36 → 33 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 18 of 128 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HireEZ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HireEZ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative19 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“"hireEZ (formerly Hiretual) leads the market in passive candidate sourcing with AI-powered search across 45+ platforms"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Strategic sourcing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Key difference: Best all-rounder for outreach automation and multi-source aggregation” Kimi K2 · Strategic sourcing · comparative prompt · first choice
“hireEZ excels at open‑web sourcing with deep ATS integration and AI automation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Strategic sourcing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Compare SeekOut and hireEZ if you're struggling to find specialized candidates or want broader discovery.” GPT-6 Luna · Strategic sourcing · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HireEZ, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HireEZ was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HireEZ, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HireEZ was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HireEZ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named HireEZ and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
lever.co12
pin.com11
leonar.app9
gem.com8
hireez.comYour site8
juicebox.ai8
matchr.io8
hirebasis.com7
intervue.io5
linkedin.com5
Seventy-three of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming HireEZ came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hireez.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HireEZ takes 0% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.ShowHide
Search and answers
hireez.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HireEZ takes 0% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “strategic sourcing software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“hireez”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 43 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,058 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 775 · 33 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,268
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 128 in strategic sourcing
Segment leader
15%
oboloo
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 21 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hireez.com
2,110
subdomains included
Content
263
counted in the table below
Documentation
65
Product · Integration
10 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 174 | 3 | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Case study | 31 | 0 | 2023-09-26 | ||
| News or press | 17 | 0 | 2025-11-11 | ||
| Comparison | 15 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 7 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 5 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2022-02-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-07-09Hireez nexxt talroo partnership blog
- 2026-07-09Blue collar talent crunch blog
- 2026-07-09Agentic ai recruiting blog
- 2025-11-11Hireez launches resumesense news or press
- 2025-08-20Hireez appoints dr tianlong chen as chief ai scientist news or press
- 2025-03-28Hireez unveils agentic ai news or press
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 26, 2025 to October 29, 2025SHRM InclusionKentucky International Convention Center, Louisville, USA · hybrid
- October 15, 2025 to October 16, 2025RecFest USNashville, USA
As the event pages on hireez.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hireez.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as HireEZ
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HireEZ; a claim can dispute any of them.
hireEZ 9HireEZ (formerly Hiretual) 1hireEZ (formerly Hiretual) 1
Follow HireEZ
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HireEZ is its own company.ShowHide
The company
HireEZ is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- agentic AI recruiting platform built on top of your existing ATS
- For
- Used across the mid-market and enterprise
- Price stated
- Solo recruiters start at $494/mo with a 7-day free trial. For enterprise teams, seats are still part of the model, but pricing is configured to the stack hireEZ replaces rather than a flat per-seat rate times headcount. hireez.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 494/mo hireez.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free hireez.com
- Integrations claimed
- 45 hireez.com · 40 hireez.com/pricing · 50 hireez.com/platform · 100 hireez.com/partners pages disagree
- Certifications
- GDPRCCPASOC 2 Type IIISO 27001/27701
- Customers named
- UCSF HealthHatchworksWilsonGreg McKeownWilsonHCG
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What HireEZ's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: hireez.com, hireez.com/pricing, hireez.com/platform, hireez.com/case-studies, hireez.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HireEZ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HireEZ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HireEZ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HireEZ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HireEZ, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.