Every category where a model named IBM Maximo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	89 of 107	50%	6	under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 34%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, IBM Maximo held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Fixed asset accounting · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 51 → 72 of 80

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 28 → 87 of 104

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 10 → 8 of 104

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Fixed asset accounting	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 28 → 89 of 107

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated IBM Maximo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative18 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“it's EAM first, fixed asset accounting second. Best for asset-intensive industries.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Large, asset-intensive enterprises (manufacturing, utilities, transportation)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Large enterprises with complex operations” Mistral Small · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Overkill for Small Businesses (Avoid: Heavy CMMS) ... like IBM Maximo or Facilio are powerful but can be dangerous traps” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · hard negative

“typically more complex than accounting-first tools” Perplexity Sonar · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Complex setup, high cost” Grok 4.1 Fast · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as IBM Maximo, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM Maximo was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sage Fixed Assets24 of 3615Not among the top eight

Asset Panda15 of 361Not among the top eight

Oracle Fusion Cloud Fixed Assets14 of 366Not among the top eight

SAP Asset Accounting13 of 363Not among the top eight

NetSuite Fixed Assets Management10 of 362Not among the top eight

UpKeep9 of 360Not among the top eight

Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS8 of 361Not among the top eight

Fiix5 of 360Not among the top eight

GoCodes5 of 360Not among the top eight

Infor EAM5 of 360Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM Maximo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 36 answers that named IBM Maximo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

facilio.com24

worldmetrics.org21

guideflow.com20

assetpanda.com15

gitnux.org14

assetcues.com13

financesonline.com12

softwareconnect.com12

g2.com11

gocodes.com11

153 of the 153 domain citations in answers naming IBM Maximo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/fixed-asset-management-software20

facilio.com/blog/fixed-asset-management-software18

assetpanda.com/resource-center/compare/best-asset-management-software15

financesonline.com/fixed-asset-management12

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-fixed-asset-management-software12

worldmetrics.org/best/fixed-assets-management-software12

assetcues.com/blog/fixed-asset-tracking-software11

gocodes.com/fixed-asset-management/best-fixed-asset-management-softwares11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where IBM Maximo stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 4,400 a month (“ibm maximo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 212 a month
Its own site: It sits on IBM's site (ibm.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 89 of 107 in fixed asset accounting

Segment leader

34%

Sage Fixed Assets

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 36 answers
Its own site cited: in 36 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as IBM Maximo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM Maximo; a claim can dispute any of them.

IBM Maximo Application Suite 1

Follow IBM Maximo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

IBM is the company behind IBM Maximo.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from IBM: IBM Apptio Cloudability, IBM Blueworks Live, IBM Cognos, IBM Cognos Analytics, IBM Cognos Controller, IBM Envizi, IBM InfoSphere Data Architect, IBM OpenPages and 2 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Maximize asset uptime and value with unified asset lifecycle management
ibm.com/products/maximo
For: operations, maintenance and facility teams
ibm.com/products/maximo
Price stated: The IBM® Maximo® Application Suite (MAS) comes in two packages: client managed software or software as a service (SaaS). MAS is purchased using a simplified licensing and usage model leveraging a credit-based system called AppPoints. ibm.com/products/maximo
Starting price: Starting under US$ 40K per year ibm.com/products/maximo/pricing
Free plan or trial: Try IBM Maximo for free ibm.com/products/maximo
Hosting: USCanadaGermanyUKUAEAustraliaIndiaSingapore
Customers named: Spendrups BryggeriVPIDownerSund & Bælt Holding A/STransport for LondonThe Royal Melbourne hospital
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, certifications

What IBM Maximo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ibm.com/products/maximo, developer.ibm.com/components/maximo, developer.ibm.com/tutorials/custom-analytics-function-maximo, ibm.com/products/maximo/demo, ibm.com/products/maximo/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM Maximo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM Maximo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for IBM Maximo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where IBM Maximo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name IBM Maximo, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.