Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 → 14 of 80
1 category · RankedUpKeep
33Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Fixed asset accounting for mid-market buyers
Rank 17 of 107 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of UpKeep →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business14 of 81
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market17 of 107
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise106 of 109
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named UpKeep for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 17 of 107 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, UpKeep held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Fixed asset accounting · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 → 19 of 104
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 80 → 101 of 104
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed asset accounting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 17 of 107 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated UpKeep across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated UpKeep across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative20 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best fit for "maintenance-led teams that need live equipment status and measurable preventive-work order execution"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Maintenance-led teams needing mobile work orders, preventive schedules” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Maintenance teams and operational efficiency” Mistral Small · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Noted as not being an accounting system, so it may not be suitable if you require full financial integration and reporting.” Mistral Small · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as UpKeep, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UpKeep was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as UpKeep, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UpKeep was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UpKeep. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 33 answers that named UpKeep and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
facilio.com17
tech.co17
worldmetrics.org17
guideflow.com16
capterra.com15
softwareadvice.com14
gitnux.org12
softwareconnect.com12
assetcues.com11
assetpanda.com11
142 of the 142 domain citations in answers naming UpKeep came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
upkeep.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, UpKeep takes 0% of first choices and Sage Fixed Assets takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
upkeep.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, UpKeep takes 0% of first choices and Sage Fixed Assets takes 34%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “fixed asset tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “fixed asset accounting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 14,800 a month (“upkeep”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 896 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 61,231 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 10,569 · 703 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,434
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 107 in fixed asset accounting
Segment leader
34%
Sage Fixed Assets
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 33 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 32 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on upkeep.com
5,170
subdomains included
Content
1,476
counted in the table below
Documentation
4
Product · Integration
233 · 40
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 906 | 16 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 175 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 130 | 0 | 2024-02-26 | ||
| Conference or event | 107 | 8 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Case study | 66 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 35 | 1 | 2026-07-20 | ||
| Comparison | 32 | 0 | 2026-02-17 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 16 | 0 | 2026-01-22 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | 0 | 2020-12-17 | ||
| News or press | 4 | 0 | 2022-04-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24The ai maintenance race conference or event
- 2026-09-11Mobile purchase orders blog
- 2026-09-07Food manufacturing ehs software blog
- 2026-09-07Preventive maintenance compliance blog
- 2026-09-07Best equipment maintenance software blog
- 2026-09-07Maintenance ticketing system blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page upkeep.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow UpKeep
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
UpKeep is its own company.ShowHide
The company
UpKeep is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Native Platform for CMMS, Safety, and Asset Operations
- For
- maintenance teams
- Price stated
- starts at $24 per user per month upkeep.com
- Starting price
- 24 upkeep.com
- Free plan or trial
- All plans include a free trial with no credit card required. upkeep.com
- Certifications
- CCPAGDPRSOC 2 Type 2SOC 2 compliant
- Hosting
- United States
- Customers named
- UnileverChevronCaterpillarMcDonald'sRaceway Car WashALCO HarvestingAddison HVACChick-fil-A
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What UpKeep's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: upkeep.com, upkeep.com/pricing, trust.upkeep.com, upkeep.com/product, upkeep.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UpKeep's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UpKeep, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for UpKeep by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where UpKeep is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name UpKeep, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.