AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › LexisNexis · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

LexisNexis

10Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LexisNexis was named 3 times in Transfer pricing, where TPGenie led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business88 of 100
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market101 of 101
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise114 of 114
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In transfer pricing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LexisNexis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Transfer pricingTax and compliance0%101 of 101100%3under 10 labels · led by TPGenie at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LexisNexis yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LexisNexis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Legacy "Patchwork" Solutions (Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE, Wolters Kluwer, LexisNexis) ... Slow adaptation to modern, agile workflows” Kimi K2 · Transfer pricing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be highly cautious with legacy enterprise suites (ONESOURCE, Wolters Kluwer, LexisNexis) if you're a mid-size or smaller company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Transfer pricing · negative prompt · soft negative
“many older ONESOURCE or LexisNexis implementations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Transfer pricing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LexisNexis, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LexisNexis was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE9 of 100Not among the top eight
Wolters Kluwer6 of 100Not among the top eight
Aibidia5 of 100Not among the top eight
Exactera Transfer Pricing5 of 100Not among the top eight
TPGenie4 of 102Not among the top eight
Commenda3 of 100Not among the top eight
Sovos Transfer Pricing2 of 100Not among the top eight
Wolter Kluwer2 of 100Not among the top eight
t02 of 100Not among the top eight
Dun & Bradstreet1 of 100Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LexisNexis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named LexisNexis and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

activantcapital.com9
g2.com9
gitnux.org9
digitalheroesco.com8
finance.toolsinfo.com7
slashdot.org7
zipdo.co7
getsphere.com6
worldmetrics.org6
commenda.io5

Seventy-three of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming LexisNexis came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

activantcapital.com/research/the-future-of-transfer-pricing9
g2.com/categories/transfer-pricing9
digitalheroesco.com/journal/problems-transfer-pricing-documentation-software-digital-heroe8
gitnux.org/best/transfer-pricing-software8
finance.toolsinfo.com/c/transfer-pricing/guide7
slashdot.org/software/transfer-pricing7
zipdo.co/best/transfer-pricing-software7
getsphere.com/blog/best-transfer-pricing-software-for-compliance6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

lexisnexis.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LexisNexis takes 0% of first choices and TPGenie takes 30%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “transfer pricing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “transfer pricing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 951,707 a month
Searches its site ranks for
63,270 · 5,600 in the top three
Sites linking to it
54,450
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 6 clicks and $107 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
55+ ads · 37 text, 15 image, 3 video · 55 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as RELX INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 21 in the year, 34 before. 65 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 101 of 101 in transfer pricing
Segment leader
30%
TPGenie
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
10 answers
Its own site cited
in 10 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on lexisnexis.com
10,007
subdomains included
Content
4,987
counted in the table below
Documentation
112
Product · Integration
1,160 · 6
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,93612026-08-28
News or press1,23902022-03-30
Report or ebook54802023-02-14
Glossary or explainer378undated
Webinar or virtual event31402024-08-29
Case study24402026-06-11
Podcast or video240undated
Template or tool3902026-06-08
Comparison2532026-09-29
Conference or event2402025-09-03

Events in person

Last twelve months
  • November 4, 2025LexCon GrazSchubert Kino, Graz, Österreich · took part
  • November 3, 2025LexCon SalzburgMozartkino, Salzburg, Österreich · took part
  • October 21, 2025LexCon InnsbruckMetropol Kino, Innsbruck, Österreich · took part

As the event pages on lexisnexis.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page lexisnexis.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow LexisNexis

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

LexisNexis is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Provider of legal, government, business and high-tech information sources.
lexisnexis.com
For
law firms, corporations, government agencies and academic institutions seeking legal solutions, news & business insights
lexisnexis.com
Free plan or trial
Yes. You can request a trial of Nexis Diligence+ to explore how it supports your compliance and due diligence needs. lexisnexis.com/en-ae/compliance/nexis-diligence/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2SOC 2 Type 1SOC 3ISO 14001:2015CCPAGDPRHIPAAISO/IEC 27001
Customers named
LexisLexis+ AILexis+ with ProtegeCaseMap+Harper MacleodIrwin Mitchell SolicitorsHex TrustMBI (Maxigen Biotech Inc.)
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, hosting

What LexisNexis's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: lexisnexis.com, lexisnexis.com/en-ae/compliance/nexis-diligence/pricing, trust.lexisnexis.com, lexisnexis.com/en-sg/products/PSL, lexisnexis.com/en-hk/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LexisNexis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LexisNexis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LexisNexis by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where LexisNexis is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name LexisNexis, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lexisnexis.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.