Finance AI Index

Index › Products › Rebates-On · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Rebates-On

11Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Rebates-On was named 1 time in Rebate management, where Enable led with 52%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business6 of 90

under the label threshold

Mid-market41 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise5 of 79

under the label threshold

In rebate management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Rebates-On for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Rebate management	Receivables and billing	0%	41 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Enable at 52%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rebates-On yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rebates-On across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for IT Providers & VARs (Inbound Rebates): Rebates-On” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Rebate management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rebates-On, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rebates-On was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Enable9 of 112Not among the top eight

Voucherify7 of 111Not among the top eight

Vistex7 of 110Not among the top eight

incentX6 of 113Not among the top eight

e-bate6 of 112Not among the top eight

Vendavo6 of 110Not among the top eight

Model N4 of 110Not among the top eight

Salesforce Rebate Management2 of 111Not among the top eight

Channel Fusion2 of 110Not among the top eight

Spreadjust1 of 111Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rebates-On. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Rebates-On and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com9

rebates-on.comYour site9

sourceforge.net8

us.fitgap.com7

guideflow.com6

level6.com6

f6s.com5

oncentive.io5

featuredcustomers.com4

tei.forrester.com4

Fifty-four of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming Rebates-On came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rebates-on.com/pricing8

g2.com/categories/rebate-management7

guideflow.com/blog/rebate-management-software6

level6.com/blog/best-rebate-management-tools6

sourceforge.net/software/rebate-management/for-small-business6

us.fitgap.com/search/rebate-management-software/b2b6

f6s.com/software/category/rebate-management5

oncentive.io/blog/best-rebate-management-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

rebates-on.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Rebates-On takes 0% of first choices and Enable takes 52%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “rebate management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “rebate management platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 20 a month (“rebates-on”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 50,534 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 33 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 46 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 561
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 41 of 80 in rebate management

Segment leader

52%

Enable

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 11 answers
Its own site cited: in 11 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on rebates-on.com

314

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Comparison	13	undated		Rebate management
Blog	10	5	2026-09-06
Case study	2	1	2026-09-06
Report or ebook	2	undated
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-06Vendor rebate programs compared blog
2026-09-06Marco technologies case study
2026-07-26Certification costs spend that never works blog
2026-07-21Vendor complexity rebate dollars blog
2026-07-16Microsoft partner incentives what changed blog
2026-07-14Expiring certifications rebate loss blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page rebates-on.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Rebates-On

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Rebates-On is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Track rebates, incentives, MDF and certifications across every vendor from one place - and see the next move that protects or grows your rebate revenue.
rebates-on.com
For: Built for multi-vendor partners
rebates-on.com
Price stated: Two simple parts: a one-time setup per vendor program, then per-vendor subscription with unlimited users. No per-seat fees and no sticker games. Pricing is tailored to your vendor mix, with volume-based per-vendor rates and a separate one-time setup fee per vendor program. Cisco is the one carve-out, priced separately and added on top. rebates-on.com/pricing
Integrations claimed: 20 rebates-on.com/product
Customers named: Marco TechnologiesCellcomTrace3TaldorHiperMarcoCellcom Israel
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting

What Rebates-On's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: rebates-on.com, rebates-on.com/pricing, rebates-on.com/wiki/compliance, rebates-on.com/product, rebates-on.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rebates-On's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rebates-On, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rebates-On by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Rebates-On is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rebates-On, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.